Skip to main content
. 2004 Oct;17(4):982–1011. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.982-1011.2004

TABLE 6.

Comparison of assays available for diagnosis of ocular C. trachomatis infection

Test Detection target Specimens Check for specimen adequacy? Transport conditions Technical complexity Processing time Performance characteristicsa
Cost
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Microscopy
    Giemsa/iodine Inclusions Conjunctival scraping Yes No refrigeration required ++ 30 min 30-60 50-70 +
    Fluorescein Antigen Conjunctival swab ++ 30 min 60-80 80-95 ++
Culture Infectious organisms Conjunctival swab No Cold chain in transport medium +++ 48-72 h 50-70 100 ++++
Enzyme immunoassay
    Lab based Antigen Conjunctival swab No No refrigeration required ++ 4-6 h 60-80 80-95 +
    Rapid + 30 min 50-70 80-95 ++
Nucleic acid hybridization DNA Conjunctival swab No No refrigeration requiredb ++++ 4-6 h 60-80 95-100 +++
Nucleic acid amplification DNA or RNA Conjunctival swab No No refrigeration requiredb ++++ 4-6 h 90-100 95-100 ++++
1-2 h for     real-time     PCR
Serology Human antichlamydial antibody (IgA, IgG, or IgM) Serum, tears Yes No refrigeration required +++ 4-6 h ? ? +++
a

Performance compared against a reference standard of culture and/or nucleic acid amplification test. The ranges given represent best current estimates; the difficulties involved in assigning numerical values to the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for ocular C. trachomatis are discussed in the text.

b

Requirements for transport medium and transport conditions vary for different assays.