Table 2. Differences in Prevalence Rates and Means in Alcohol Involvement Variables Between Washington State and Victoria.
Washington | Victoria | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
Prevalence | Prevalence | |||||
Variables | Range | (%)* | Mean (SD) | (%)* | Mean (SD) | Effect size d |
Early onset of alcohol use | 0∼4 | 43.7 | 1.23 (1.57) | 65.9 | 1.86 (1.58) | .40 |
Frequent alcohol use | 0∼3 | 21.5 | 0.30 (0.66) | 43.6 | 0.68 (0.92) | .47 |
Heavy drinking | 0∼3 | 15.4 | 0.28 (0.74) | 29.9 | 0.53 (0.92) | .30 |
Alcohol harm | 0∼6 | 20.8 | 0.53 (1.24) | 35.9 | 0.98 (1.66) | .31 |
Note: All of the mean differences between states were significant using t-tests at p < .001: mean and pooled standard deviations were used to calculate effect size, d specified by Cohen (1988) that d of.20 indicates small, of .50 indicates medium, and of .80 indicates large effect size.
Prevalence rates were computed based on the proportion of youth involved in the indicated alcohol problems; for early onset of alcohol use, prevalence was estimated based on the number of youth who had initiated alcohol by age 13.