Table 2.
Curriculum (school n=10, class n=30, student n=760) |
Wellness (school n=10, class n=30, student n=756) |
Control (school n=5, student n=377) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Facilitator Behaviors | ||||||
Fidelitya (class level, max=100) |
95.2±4.0 | 66.7±32.6e | - | |||
Teacher Interesta (class level, max=3) |
2.4±0.3 | 2.5±0.4 | - | |||
Participant Behaviors (Responsiveness) | ||||||
Overall Satisfactionb (student level, max=5) |
4.0±1.0 | 4.1 ±1.0 | - | |||
Dance Breaks Satisfactionb (student level, max=5) |
- | 4.3±0.9 | - | |||
Snack Policy Satisfactionb (student level, max=5) |
- | 3.5±1.1 | - | |||
Curriculum Recallb (student level, max=5) |
−3.4±1.2 | - | ||||
Program Outcomes (EBRBs) | Pretest | Posttest | Pretest | Posttest | Pretest | Posttest |
Healthy Behavior (HB)c (student level, max=100) |
55.08 ±12.15 | 54.52 ±10.82 | 55.14 ±12.59 | 53.38 ±10.85 | 52.45 ±9.78 | 52.62 ±10.78 |
Unhealthy Eating Behavior Frequency and Sedentary Behavior (UBF)c (student level, max=100) |
61.10 ±17.28 | 58.51 ±16.04 | 60.81 ±16.56 | 57.64 ±14.68 | 64.71 ±15.22 | 59.02 ±13.30 |
Unhealthy Eating Behavior Portion Size (UBS)c (student level, max=100) |
63.68 ±18.09 | 59.79 ±16.16 | 64.1 ±17.35 | 59.67 ±15.04 | 67.93 ±15.53 | 61.29 ±12.64 |
Notes: Data for students in Curriculum+Wellness were collected as part of each intervention and are included with the corresponding descriptives.
Data are from curriculum feedback forms (n=611) and wellness classroom tracking posters (class n=29) Maximum curriculum was 23 45-minute lessons, maximum wellness was daily 165–175 10-minute dance breaks, including dance breaks without a FHC instructor present. Teacher interest is a mean score calculated from mean teacher participation and mean teacher attitude for each class
Data are from curriculum student surveys (n=494) and wellness student surveys (n=474), except curriculum recall data, which are from lesson artifacts collected ¾ of the way through the curriculum (n=515).
All scales based on self-reported student EBRB data from the FHC-Q administered at baseline and after the Food, Health & Choices intervention; scales calculated using factor loadings from a Promax-rotated exploratory factor analysis and are reported on a scale of 0–100, with higher scores indicating more of the indicated behavior
One school’s fidelity data were excluded, making school n=9, class n=26, student n=954