Table 2.
Animal ID | −9.36 mm (%) | −8.88 mm (%) | −8.40 mm (%) | −8.04 mm (%) | Average Lesion Size (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
JP152 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 80 | 94 |
JP158 | 65 | 65 | 95 | 75 | 75 |
JP166 | 95 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 98 |
JP167 | 70 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 90 |
JP170 | 80 | 100 | 95 | 80 | 89 |
JP171 | 70 | 100 | 90 | 75 | 84 |
JP172 | 75 | 95 | 98 | 95 | 91 |
JP173 | 50 | 100 | 95 | 95 | 85 |
JP174 | 100 | 80 | 75 | 100 | 89 |
Mean ± SEM | 78 ± 6 | 92 ± 4 | 93 ± 2 | 89 ± 6 | 88 ± 2 |
POR damage for each A/P location in each animal. Slices were chosen in each hemisphere based on the section which corresponded most to the template (Fig. 2; Paxinos and Watson, 2008).