Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 23;18(1):95–105. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0733-5

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Study Intervention Participants Moderators Effect sizes
Program name Number of sessions Country Target group Child’s age Adaptationsa Methodological rigorb Parenting behavior Child behavior Parental perspectives
Bjørknes and Manger 2013 Parent Management Training–Oregon Model (PMTO) 18 Norway Muslim immigrant mothers from Somalia and Pakistan, who described their child’s behavior as a conduct problem 3–9 D/D/B 0/0/0 0.24 0.30
Brotman et al. 2011 ParentCorps 13 USA Parents of children enrolled in prekindergarten in schools in large urban school districts 4 D/L/E 0/0/0 0.44
Coard et al. 2007 Black Parenting Strengths and Strategies (BPSS) 12 USA Low-income caregivers who self-identified as African American 5–6 D/D/E 0/0/1 1.22 0.54
Day et al. 2012 Empowering Parents, Empowering Communities 8 UK Socially disadvantaged families who identified difficulties in managing the child’s behavior 2–11 S/L/B 0/0/0 0.57 0.30 0.16
Fagan and Stevenson 2002 Men as Teachers 6 USA African American fathers of children enrolled in services for low-income families 5.9 (mean) D/L/B 1/0/1 0.43 0.31
Ghosh Ippen 1999 (No name) 9 USA Low-income caregivers who self-identified as Latino 8–11 S/L/E 1/1/1 0.29 0.08
Gottfredson et al. 2006 Strengthening Washington DC Families Project 14 USA Parent’s living in high-risk neighborhoods 0–12 B/L/E 1/1/0 0.00 −0.04
Gross et al. 2003 Incredible Years Parenting Program 12 USA Parents of children enrolled in day care centers that serve low-income families 2–3 S/L/E 0/1/0 0.50 0.12 0.42
Gross et al. 2009 Chicago Parent Program 12 USA Parents of children enrolled in day care centers that serve low-income families 2–4 S/D/E 0/0/0 −0.07 −0.02 −0.04
Kim et al. 2008 Incredible Years Parenting Program 12 USA First generation Korean American mothers 3–8 S/L/B 0/0/1 0.10 0.01
Kim et al. 2014 Korean Parent Training Program (KPTP) 12 USA First generation Korean American mothers 3–8 D/D/B 0/0/1 0.76 0.51 0.51
Lau et al. 2011 Incredible Years Parenting Program 14 USA Chinese American parents with concerns about parenting or child behavior problems 5–12 D/L/E 0/0/1 0.84 0.76 0.40
Leijten et al. 2015 Incredible Years Parenting Program 12 to 18c The Netherlands Mothers experiencing parenting difficulties due to disruptive child behavior, recruited from outpatient clinics for child and adolescent psychiatry and in deprived neighborhoods 3–8 S/L/E 0/0/0 0.32 0.34 0.07
Matsumoto et al. 2007 Triple P Positive Parenting Program 8 Australia Japanese Australian caregivers 2–10 S/L/B 0/0/1 0.25 0.38 0.47
Taylor et al. 1997 Group Well Child Care 7 USA Mothers with one or more risk factors: poverty, single marital status at delivery, less than high school education, age less than 20 years at delivery, previous substance abuse or history of abuse as a child. 0 B/L/B 1/0/0 0.16 0.11
Turner et al. 2007 Triple P Positive Parenting Program 8 Australia Australian indigenous families with concerns about the child’s behavior or parenting skills 1–13 D/L/B 0/0/1 0.56 0.15
Webster-Stratton 1998 PARTNERS 8 to 9 USA Mothers of children enrolled in day care centers for low-income families 4 S/L/B 1/0/0 0.33 0.10
Webster-Stratton et al. 2001 Incredible Years Parenting Program 12 USA Mothers of children enrolled in day care centers for low-income families 4 S/L/B 1/0/0 0.04 0.14
Overall effect size 0.30 0.13 0.18

aModerators: cultural sensitivity (B = basic, S = surface structure, D = deep structure), process of adaptation (L = no to little information, D = detailed information), program delivery (B = basic, E = enhanced)

bModerators: type of comparison condition (0 = no intervention, 1 = alternate intervention), intervention condition (0 = parent group alone, 1 = parent group plus additional intervention), sample size (0 = more than 35 per condition, 1 = 35 or less per condition)

cDuring the study, the number of sessions for the program was extended by the developer