Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 14;23(2):275–285. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.275

Table 2.

Comparison of qualitative features between grades and stages

Feature Grade
ENETS TNM stage1
Total G12 G2-32 P value Total I/II2 III/IV2 P value
Location 0.094 0.059
Head 24 11 (45.8) 13 (54.2) 23 7 (30.4) 16 (69.6)
Body 25 18 (72) 7 (28) 22 14 (63.6) 8 (36.4)
Tail 6 2 (33.3) 4 (66.7) 6 4 (66.7) 2 (33.3)
Margins < 0.001 < 0.001
Well defined 39 28 (71.8) 11 (28.2) 35 24 (68.6) 11 (31.4)
Ill defined 16 3 (18.8) 13 (81.2) 16 1 (6.2) 15 (93.8)
Vasc. infiltration 0.022 - - - -
Present 7 1 (14.3) 6 (85.7)
Absent 48 30 (62.5) 18 (37.5)
Liver metastases 0.002 - - - -
Present 7 0 (0) 7 (100)
Absent 48 31 (64.6) 17 (35.4)
Atrophy3 0.446 0.151
Present 13 7 (53.8) 6 (46.2) 13 4 (30.8) 9 (69.2)
Absent 36 22 (61.1) 14 (38.9) 32 17 (53.1) 15 (46.9)
MPD dilation4 0.215 0.151
Present 13 6 (46.2) 7 (53.8) 13 4 (30.8) 9 (69.2)
Absent 36 23 (63.9) 13 (36.1) 32 17 (53.1) 15 (46.9)
CBD dilation4 0.264 0.275
Present 7 2 (28.6) 5 (71.4) 7 1 (14.3) 6 (85.7)
Absent 17 9 (52.9) 8 (47.1) 16 6 (37.5) 10 (62.5)
1

Four lesions were excluded from this analysis (minimally invasive surgery without lymphadenectomy);

2

Number of cases/cases in row;

3

Pancreatic head/body lesions;

4

Pancreatic head lesions. Data are presented as numbers of cases. ENETS: European Neuroendocrine Society; TNM: Tumor-nodes-metastases.