Table 3.
Population: General population aged between 54 and 85.3 years (median/mean) Settings: Health examinations, geriatric hospitals Exposure/Risk: Vitamin D deficiency Comparison: No vitamin D deficiency (reference group) | ||||||
Outcomes | Comparative risk (95% CI) and narrative results | Relative effect (95% CI) | Number of participants (number of studies) | Quality of evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
No exposure (no vitamin D deficiency) | Exposure (vitamin D deficiency) | |||||
Incidence of dementia (Results meta-analysis) Follow-up:18.03 years (weighted mean) | Study population (≥50 nmol/L or ≥ 54–159 nmol/L) | (<25 nmol/L or 7–28 nmol/L) | Point (raw) 1.54 (1.19 to 1.99) | 18 639 subjects (5 studies) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ Very lowa,b | |
Incidence of dementia (Narrative results) Follow-up: 7 years | Study population (≥25 nmol/L) | (<25 nmol/L) | OR 19.57 (1.11 to 343.69) | 40 subjects (1 study) |
Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, nmol/L nanomoles per Litre, OR odds ratio
aRisk of bias: Adjustment for confounders varies across study groups, Apo E ε4 genoytpe only considered in one study
bIndirectness: no study investigated the direct relationship between solar radiation and dementia, vitamin D is a surrogate parameter