Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 13;17:6. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0203-9

Table 4.

Univariate analysis of predictors for adverse surgical outcome

Parameter Number Adverse surgical outcomea Pb
Total 335 174 (52%)
Sex (n, %) 0.389
 Male 290 152 (53%)
 Female 45 22 (49%)
ASA score (n, %) 0.002
 1 – 2 193 87 (45%)
 3 – 4 142 87 (61%)
BMI 0.252
 <25 kg/m2 179 96 (53%)
 ≥25 kg/m2 154 76 (49%)
Recent Smoking (n, %) 0.036
 Yes 170 97 (57%)
 None 165 77 (47%)
Multimodal therapy (n, %) 0.081
 None 73 43 (59%)
 Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy 189 101 (53%)
 Perioperative chemotherapy 73 30 (41%)
Surgical approach (n, %) 0.342
 Thoracoabdominal 309 159 (52%)
 Transhiatal 26 15 (58%)
Reconstruction (n, %) 0.036
 Gastric tube 321 163 (51%)
 Colon interposition 14 11 (79%)
Anastomosis (n, %) 0.017
 Intrathoracic 185 88 (59%)
 Cervical 150 86 (47%)
Tumor histological type (n, %) 0.383
 Squamous cell carcinoma 137 73 (53%)
 Adenocarcinoma 198 101 (51%)
UICC-Stage (n, %) 0.149
 1 – 2 251 135 (54%)
 3 – 4 84 39 (46%)
Treatment period 0.015
 1996 – 2005 159 93 (53%)
 2006 – 2014 176 81 (46%)
Perioperative blood transfusion 0.038
 Yes 203 112 (55%)
 No 126 56 (44%)
Intraoperative fluid rate 0.479
 <13 ml/kg/h 166 85 (51%)
 ≥13 ml/kg/h 167 87 (52%)
Fluid balance POD 0 0.001
 <6000 ml 166 71 (43%)
 ≥6000 ml 166 100 (61%)
Fluid balance POD 4 0.001
 <5500 ml 164 69 (42%)
 ≥5500 ml 165 99 (60%)

aAt least one Complication grade 3 or higher graded according to Clavien/Dindo, bFisher's exact test

We performed a risk factors analysis for the occurrence of adverse surgical outcome (defined as at least one complication graded 3 or higher). Displayed are the analysed risk factors and their impact on the outcome