Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 19;7:2023–2036. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.7.193

Table 2.

Comparison of miR-106a detection in serum samples of GC patients and healthy volunteers using the nanobiosensor and qRT-PCR. Data are presented as the means of five replicates.

cancerous serum samples miR-106a nanobiosensor qRT-PCR healthy serum samples miR-106a nanobiosensor qRT-PCR
mean (pM) RSD % mean (pM) RSD % mean (pM) RSD % mean (pM) RSD %

1 8.33 2.40 9.30 2.46 1 2.05 2.95 2.42 2.58
2 8.85 3.12 11.2 2.20 2 1.39 4.56 1.12 4.93
3 7.31 4.40 8.42 3.05 3 0.96 2.08 0.79 3.35
4 8.24 3.40 9.51 3.51 4 0.94 3.43 0.76 2.02
5 8.67 1.99 11.6 2.11 5 1.30 3.63 1.94 2.44
6 8.39 2.91 10.5 3.18 6 2.17 4.55 1.24 3.70
7 7.26 3.05 9.28 2.12 7 0.85 2.44 1.23 4.08
8 9.64 2.68 10.3 4.07 8 2.06 3.90 2.27 4.60
9 7.66 2.95 8.47 3.15 9 1.13 4.19 2.11 3.55
10 7.29 2.27 9.25 2.03 10 0.75 2.05 1.08 2.82
average 8.16 9.79 average 1.36 1.50