. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: Curr Anthropol. 2015 Nov 3;57(6):761–784. doi: 10.1086/689307

Table 5.

Association between hunting, medicinal plant, and local environmental knowledge and nutritional status

	BMI	Mid-arm circumference	Sum 4 skinfolds
A.- Men (n=165)

	Model 1A	Model 2A	Model 3A

Hunting knowledge	0.963 (0.163)***	0.906 (0.168)***	1.234 (1.124)
Medicinal plant knowledge	-0.037 (0.299)	-0.214 (0.441)	1.731 (1.386)
Local environmental knowledge	0.585 (0.319)	0.384 (0.473)	3.09 (1.94)

B.- Non-pregnant women (n=164)

	Model 1B	Model 2B	Model 3B

Hunting knowledge	-0.147 (0.402)	-0.237 (0.454)	-3.365 (2.384)
Medicinal plant knowledge	0.122 (0.220)	0.248 (0.236)	0.998 (1.566)
Local environmental knowledge	0.123 (0.414)	0.269 (0.509)	0.366 (2.77)

Note: Each cell (coefficients and standard error) correspond to the result of a different regression model using as dependent variable the variable indicated in the column head, and as main explanatory variable the knowledge variable indicated in the raw head. We used the same controls than in Tables 3-4.