Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 17;17:79. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2140-8

Table 2.

Comparison of LAMP, smear and culture methods for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis

Culture+ Culture– Se %(95% CI) Sp %(95% CI) PPV (%) NPV (%) κ
LAMP+ 21 1 75(56.6–87.3) 98(89.5–99.6) 95.5 87.5 0.77
LAMP- 7 49
Smear+ 22 1 78.6(60.5–89.8) 98(89.5–99.6) 95.6 89.1 0.797
Smear- 6 49
Smear + Smear -
LAMP+ 19 3 82.6(62.9–93) 94.5(85.2–98.1) 86.4 92.9 0.83
LAMP- 4 52
Culture + Smear + Culture- Smear -
LAMP+ 19 3 86.4(66.7–95.3) 94.6(85.4–98.2) 86.4 94.6 0.82
LAMP- 3 53
Culture + Smear- Culture-Smear+
LAMP+ 2 0 33.3(9.7–70) 100(20.7–100) 100 80 NA
LAMP - 4 1
LAMP+ Culture+ LAMP- Culture-
Smear + 19 4 90.4(71.1–97.4) 93(83.3–97.2) 82.6 96.4 0.82
Smear- 2 53

Se Sensitivity, Sp Specificity, PPV Positive predictive value. NPV Negative predictive value, κ Kappa value. CI confidence interval