Table 3.
Summary of the quality assessment for the included studies
First author, year of publication (reference) | Jefferies et al. 2009 [37] | Brownfoot et al. 2016 [38] |
---|---|---|
Validity questions | ||
1. Was the research question clearly stated? | Y | Y |
2. Was the selection of study subjects/patients free from bias? | Y | Y |
3. Were study groups comparable? | Y | Y |
4. Was method of handling withdrawals described? | Y | Y |
5. Was blinding used to prevent introduction of bias? | Y | Y |
6. Were intervention/exposure factor or procedure and any comparison(s) described in detail? | N | Y |
7. Were outcomes clearly defined and the measurements valid and reliable? | Y | Y |
8. Was the statistical analysis appropriate for the study design and type of outcome indicators? | Y | Y |
9. Were conclusions supported by results with biases and limitations taken into consideration? | Y | Y |
10. Is bias due to study’s funding or sponsorship unlikely? | Y | Y |
Overall quality | N | P |
American Dietetic Association Quality Criteria Checklist for Primary Research, Y yes, N no,
P, positive rating; N neural rating