Table 3.
Summary of the quality assessment for the included studies
| First author, year of publication (reference) | Jefferies et al. 2009 [37] | Brownfoot et al. 2016 [38] |
|---|---|---|
| Validity questions | ||
| 1. Was the research question clearly stated? | Y | Y |
| 2. Was the selection of study subjects/patients free from bias? | Y | Y |
| 3. Were study groups comparable? | Y | Y |
| 4. Was method of handling withdrawals described? | Y | Y |
| 5. Was blinding used to prevent introduction of bias? | Y | Y |
| 6. Were intervention/exposure factor or procedure and any comparison(s) described in detail? | N | Y |
| 7. Were outcomes clearly defined and the measurements valid and reliable? | Y | Y |
| 8. Was the statistical analysis appropriate for the study design and type of outcome indicators? | Y | Y |
| 9. Were conclusions supported by results with biases and limitations taken into consideration? | Y | Y |
| 10. Is bias due to study’s funding or sponsorship unlikely? | Y | Y |
| Overall quality | N | P |
American Dietetic Association Quality Criteria Checklist for Primary Research, Y yes, N no,
P, positive rating; N neural rating