Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Transp Health. 2016 Mar 22;3(4):467–478. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2016.02.010

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of transport-related walking and cycling

Study site n Any walking % Any cycling % Total day/week walking* M (SD) Total day/week cycling* M (SD)
Total sample 11,674 72.5 14.8 3.2 (2.7) 0.5 (1.5)
AUS- Adelaide 2,443 76.6 11.6 3.2 (2.5) 0.4 (1.2)
BEL- Ghent 1,142 52.1 43.6 2.0 (2.4) 1.7 (2.4)
BRZ- Curitiba 693 77.3 7.5 3.5 (2.6) 0.3 (1.2)
COL- Bogota 958 90.3 9.3 4.8 (2.6) 0.3 (1.2)
CZ- Olomouc 264 83.2 19.3 4.6 (2.8) 0.6 (1.5)
DEN- Aarhus 599 79.5 61.6 3.3 (2.6) 2.4 (2.6)
MEX- Cuernavaca 611 90.3 1.3 4.5 (2.5) 0.0 (0.4)
NZ- Christchurch 481 55.9 17.5 2.0 (2.4) 0.5 (1.5)
NZ- North Shore 490 65.1 6.1 2.5 (2.5) 0.2 (0.8)
NZ- Waitakere 502 62.2 7.2 2.1 (2.2) 0.2 (1.0)
NZ- Wellington 493 85.2 8.1 4.1 (2.5) 0.2 (1.0)
UK- Stoke-on-Trent 815 65.5 3.9 3.0 (2.8) 0.1 (0.8)
US- Baltimore 902 68.1 6.5 2.9 (2.7) 0.2 (0.8)
US- Seattle 1,281 68.2 9.1 2.9 (2.6) 0.2 (1.0)

Notes.

*

Including participants with 0 min/week or 0 day/week. M = mean; SD = standard deviation.

Only participants with complete data were included in the analyses.