Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 17;13(1):e1006495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006495

Table 2. Predicted and observed number of genome-wide-significant hits and PGS R2, for large-scale GWAS efforts to date for height, BMI, EduYears, and self-rated health, assuming 250k effective SNPs (i.e., independent haplotype blocks) of which 20k trait-affecting, using averaged GREML estimates from Table 1 for setting SNP heritability and CGR.

Notes on the sources for the large-scale GWAS efforts are listed in S3 Table.

Phenotype Main studies Architecture Number of hits PGS R2 using all SNPs
Study N C ** hSNP2 CGR Study Theory|CGR Attenuation* Study Theory|CGR Attenuation*
<1 =1 <1 =1
Height Wood et al. (2014) [1] 253,288 79 44.9% 0.965 697 647.26 700.24 8% 13.5% 13.2% 14.0% 6%
Allen et al. (2010) [46] 183,727 61 44.9% 0.965 180 292.03 320.77 9% 10.0% 10.5% 11.1% 6%
Weedon et al. (2008) [47] 13,665 5 44.9% 0.965 7 0.00 0.00 n.a. 2.9% 1.0% 1.1% 7%
BMI Locke et al. (2015) [2] 339,224 125 21.9% 0.917 97 188.52 241.07 22% 6.5% 4.3% 5.0% 14%
Speliotes et al. (2010) [48] 123,865 46 21.9% 0.917 19 5.48 7.64 28% 2.5% 1.8% 2.1% 15%
Willer et al. (2008) [49] 32,387 15 21.9% 0.917 1 0.01 0.02 65% n.a. 0.5% 0.6% 16%
EduYears Okbay et al. (2016) [7] 405,072 65 18.2% 0.783 162 115.28 235.90 51% n.a. 2.7% 4.1% 36%
Okbay et al. (2016) [7] 293,723 64 18.2% 0.783 74 39.30 88.93 56% 3.9% 2.0% 3.2% 36%
Rietveld et al. (2013) [50] 101,069 42 18.2% 0.783 1 0.63 1.64 62% 2.5% 0.8% 1.2% 38%
Self-rated health Harris et al. (2016) [51] 111,749 1 15.7% 0.468 13 1.35 1.35 0% n.a. 0.2% 1.0% 78%

* Attenuation measures the relatively loss in expected power and R2 due to a CGR in accordance with averaged GREML estimates from Table 1.

** C denotes the number of studies in the meta-analysis.