Table 1. Simplified table of the ten sections that make up the three ethical frameworks.
Criteria Number | WHO | Emanuel et al. | MSF |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Scientific design and conduct of the study | Scientific validity | • What is the research question? • Why is it important? • How is the methodology and proposed analysis appropriate given the research question(s)? |
2 | Risks and potential benefits | Favourable risk-benefit ratio | • What are the anticipated harms and benefits? |
3 | Protection of research participants’ privacy and confidentiality | Respect for participants | • How do you plan to protect confidentiality? • How do you plan to access, store and distribute any collected biological material? • What will happen when the research is either stopped or is complete? • How will the findings be disseminated? • How will the findings be implemented? |
4 | Informed consent process | Informed consent | • What are your plans for obtaining consent? |
5 | Community considerations | Collaborative partnership, social value | • What is the context in which the research will be conducted? • How has this influenced the research design? • Are there any other parties involved in the research? • What potential interests of these parties might conflict with MSF’s mission and values? |
6 | Selection of study population and recruitment of research participants | Fair participant selection | |
7 | Inducements, financial benefits and financial costs | ||
8 | Independent review | ||
9 | Are all relevant resources for the research secured? | ||
10 | Have the research staff the relevant training and protection? |