Table 4.
A. | B. | C. | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CES-D with DV Covariance
|
CES-D with EDEQ Covariance
|
DV with EDEQ Covariance
|
|||||||||
Common with Rumination | Unique | Common with Rumination | Unique | Common with Rumination | Unique | ||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Men | Men | ||||||||||
A | .05 | .08 | A | -.06 | .19 | A | .03 | -.10 | |||
[%]a | [40] | [60] | [%]a | [-51] | [151] | [%]a | [-46] | [146] | |||
C | .00 | .00 | C | .00 | .00 | C | .05 | .00 | |||
[%]b | [0] | [0] | [%]b | [0] | [0] | [%]b | [100] | [0] | |||
E | .08 | .03 | E | .05 | .05 | E | .06 | .04 | |||
[%]c | [73] | [27] | [%]c | [50] | [50] | [%]c | [63] | [37] | |||
Total | .24 | Total | .23 | Total | .07 | ||||||
Women | Women | ||||||||||
A | .15 | .00 | A | .06 | .00 | ||||||
[%]a | [100] | [0] | [%]a | [340] | [-240] | ||||||
C | .00 | .00 | C | -.01 | .00 | ||||||
[%]b | [0] | [0] | [%]b | [100] | [0] | ||||||
E | .07 | .06 | E | .02 | .09 | ||||||
[%]c | [54] | [46] | [%]c | [18] | [82] | ||||||
Total | .28 | Total | .16 |
Note. Percentages above 100% indicate that the genetic or environmental covariances that add up to the total positive covariance have opposite signs (+/-).
A = genetic influences; C = shared environmental influences; E = nonshared environmental influences; CES-D = Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression; DV = Dependence vulnerability.
Percentage of genetic covariance between psychopathologies that is common with rumination or unique (i.e. not common with rumination).
Percentage of shared environmental covariance between psychopathologies that is common with rumination or unique (i.e. not common with rumination).
Percentage of nonshared environmental covariance between psychopathologies that is common with rumination or unique (i.e. not common with rumination).
Rumination Latent Variable was not used in analyses including EDEQ; covariance values reflect those across independent measures of rumination.