Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 30;5:e17280. doi: 10.7554/eLife.17280

Figure 4. Patterns of rapid experience-dependent remapping in SI mirror peripheral changes in tactile discrimination performance.

(A) An example of accuracy data from the temporal order judgment task. Accuracy scores (black dots) are illustrated for an individual participant and a single run assessing performance across D2-D3. Data are fitted with a logistic function (red line) from which the just noticeable difference (JND) is calculated: a measure of temporal tactile acuity; greater JND means poorer tactile discrimination. (B) Tactile discrimination improved significantly between D3 and D4, and worsened significantly between D4 and D5 after the gluing manipulation compared with the two control conditions. In summary, fMRI evidence of rapid cortical remapping (Figure 3) concurs with behavioural changes in tactile function (B), such that the digit pair with reduction in cortical overlap (D3–D4) also shows increases in tactile discrimination, whereas the digit pair showing increase in cortical overlap (D4–D5) demonstrates worsening of tactile discrimination *p<0.05 **p<0.005 Sidak corrected. Data in (B) are presented normalised to time point control 1; all statistics were performed on raw un-normalised data. ISI: inter-stimulus interval; JND: Just Noticeable Difference. Error bars represent standard error of mean.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17280.011

Figure 4—source data 1. Data presented Figure 4B.
Just Noticeable Difference (JND) values representing tactile discrimination ability for three digit pairs (D2–D3, D3–D4 and D4–D5) across three conditions (Control 1, Control 2 and Glued).
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.17280.012
Figure 4—source data 2. Data presented Figure 4—figure supplement 1B.
Frequency of mis-localisations for motor confusion task across adjacent digit pairs (D2–D3, D3–D4 and D4–D5) across three conditions (Control 1, Control 2 and Glued).
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.17280.013

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. In a motor confusion task involving rapid button presses using the four digits under study (D2, D3, D4, D5) there is an increase in the number of mis-presses between digits 4 and 5, consistent with the observed pattern of increased cortical overlap and representational similarity observed between digit 4 and 5.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A) Distribution of presses and mis-presses for each target and each digit, averaged across Control 1 and Control 2, demonstrating a pattern of mis-presses predominantly in digits adjacent to the target. (B) Plotting the average number of mis-presses across adjacent digit pairs during different sessions reveals an increased confusion in presses between digit 4 and digit 5 in the Glued condition compared with Control 1 and Control 2, not seen in other digit pairs. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant interaction between session and digit pair on number of mis-presses (F(4,32) = 3.828, p=0.012, η2: 0.324), driven by an increase in confusion between digit 4 and 5 in the glued condition compared with controls; *p<0.05 Sidak corrected.