Table 1. Treatment Effects for Experienced Well-being: Mood Yesterday, Net Affect and U-Index.
MTREATMENT (SD) | MCONTROL (SD) | pa | pb | pa | pb | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unconditional | Conditional | |||||
Mood Yesterday | ||||||
Portion of day spent in a positive mood | 0.76 (0.18) | 0.71 (0.25) | 0.321 | 0.308 | 0.047** | 0.035** |
Portion of day spent with children in a positive mood | 0.83 (0.21) | 0.84 (0.19) | 0.821 | 0.827 | 0.783 | 0.673 |
Net Affect | ||||||
Net Affect | 3.03 (1.41) | 2.84 (1.37) | 0.511 | 0.512 | 0.329 | 0.269 |
Net affect during time spent with PFL child | 2.98 (1.58) | 2.95 (1.38) | 0.916 | 0.917 | 0.603 | 0.637 |
Net affect during time spent without PFL child | 3.00 (1.78) | 2.68 (1.59) | 0.353 | 0.356 | 0.355 | 0.188 |
U-Index | ||||||
U-Index | 0.10 (0.14) | 0.09 (0.18) | 0.686 | 0.689 | 0.777 | 0.315 |
U-Index during time spent with PFL child | 0.10 (0.16) | 0.08 (0.18) | 0.453 | 0.461 | 0.703 | 0.758 |
U-Index during time spent without PFL child | 0.11 (0.24) | 0.12 (0.27) | 0.874 | 0.875 | 0.907 | 0.235 |
Notes: The sample size is 101 (Treatment = 46, Control = 55), except when we restrict the analysis to time spend without the PFL child as 5 control participants did not record any episodes without their PFL child, therefore n = 96 (Treatment = 46, Control = 50), and apart from Mood Yesterday (Treatment = 45, Control = 55). ‘M’ indicates the unconditional mean. ‘SD’ indicates the unconditional standard deviation.
a two-tailed t-test p-value.
b two-tailed p-value from an individual permutation test with 100,000 replications.
*** Significant at the 1 percent level.
** Significant at the 5 percent level.
* Significant at the 10 percent level.