Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2016 Dec 16;320:244–254. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.013

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Conditioned responding for the predictive stimulus was not correlated with preference for the predictive stimulus. Relationship between rates of conditioned responding for the predictive stimulus (lever n = 6; light n = 6) and choice of the predictive (A) lever- and (B) light stimulus alternative. Note: panel (B) is on a different scale.