Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2016 Dec 10;27(3):537–541. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.12.021

Table 1.

Biological data on EbS and EbSe derivatives.a

STRUCTURE TbHK1% Inhibition (10 µM) TbHK1 IC50 (µM) % BSF Growth Inhibition (10 µM) BSF EC50 (µM)
1b - 0.05 ± 0.03 - 2.9 ± 0.28
2b - 2.0 ± 0.5 - 0.03 ± 0.07
6 0.87 ± 7.9% >10 77.6 ± 4.3% 7.2 ± 0.5
7 12.8 ± 7.6% >10 98.3 ± 1.3% 0.28 ± 0.1
12 0% >10 0% >10
13 0% >10 0% >10
19 18.0 ± 0.4% >10 52.5 ± 4.9% ~10
20 0% >10 10.9 ± 10.9% >10
21 2.7 ± 5.1% >10 55.6 ± 7.5% ~10
22 0% >10 0% >10
26 22.8 ± 3.8% >10 66.5 ± 10.9% 3.8 ± 0.1
27 1.7 ± 0.3% >10 8.8 ± 22.1% >10
28 79.0 ± 2.8% 3.16 ± 0.06 38.6 ± 3.8% 13.0 ± 1.5
29 0% >10 18.0 ± 20.8% >10
30 0% >10 0% >10
31 0% >10 15.8 ± 47.3% >10
32 17.2 ± 14.6% >10 12.0 ± 17.4% >10
33 18.5 ± 2.8% >10 0% >10
a

Trypanosome cultures were assayed in triplicate in a total volume of 40 µL, and the DMSO vehicle was used as a negative control. Percent inhibition was calculated by comparison to the growth of parasites grown with the DMSO controls from each plate. EbS (10 µM) was included in each assay as a positive control. Dose-response curves performed in triplicate for compounds that elicited > 50% growth inhibition at 10 µM were pursued in a 384-well plate format, with 50% effective concentrations (i.e. EC50) determined using GraphPad Prism (version 6.0) software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA).

b

data taken from Ref. 5.