Table 6.

Study 3: Mediation analysis from power to tax honesty intention (THI; standard errors in parentheses).

	Path coefficients							Indirect effects
	To THI	To IT	To RBT	To AC	To SC	To EC	To VC	Estimate	Sobel Z	Symmetric 95% CI
From covercive power (CP)	1.02 (0.18)	−0.17 (0.14)	0.13 (0.12)	0.74 (1.16)	−0.04 (0.14)	1.71 (0.18)	−0.05 (0.16)
From legitimate power (LP)	0.32 (0.22)	0.14 (0.14)	1.71 (0.12)	−1.34 (0.16)	1.64 (0.14)	0.42 (0.18)	1.05 (0.16)
From implicit trust (IT)	0.04 (0.06)
From reason-based trust (RBT)	0.22 (0.10)
From antagonistic climate (AC)	−0.04 (0.06)
From service climate (SC)	−0.05 (0.07)
From enforced compliance (EC)	−0.03 (0.05)
From voluntary cooperation (VC)	0.08 (0.07)
CP→IT→THI								−0.01 (0.02)	−0.584	−0.04; 0.01
LP→IT→THI								0.01 (0.01)	0.554	−0.01; 0.03
CP→RBT→THI								0.03 (0.03)	0.972	−0.01; 0.08
LP→RBT→THI								0.37 (0.17)	2.174	0.10; 0.65
CP→AC→THI								−0.03 (0.05)	−0.461	−0.10; 0.04
LP→AC→THI								0.05 (0.08)	0.664	−0.08; 0.18
CP→SC→THI								0.00 (0.01)	0.265	−0.02; 0.02
LP→SC→THI								−0.09 (0.11)	−0.831	−0.28; 0.10
CP→EC→THI								−0.05 (0.08)	−0.599	−0.19; 0.09
LP→EC→THI								0.09 (0.08)	−0.581	−0.05; 0.02
CP→VC→THI								−0.00 (0.02)	−0.301	−0.04; 0.02
LP→VC→THI								0.09 (0.08)	1.126	−0.04; 0.21