Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 18;8:5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00005

Table 7.

Study 4: Results of the ANOVAs with coercive power and legitimate power as independent variables.

Dependent variables α F (df1, df2) p ηp2
Perceptions of coercive power 0.87
CP 69.94 (1, 98) <0.001 0.42
LP 0.90 (1, 98) 0.35 <0.01
CPxLP 5.99 (1, 98) 0.02 0.06
Perceptions of legitimate power 0.94
CP 0.46 (1, 98) 0.50 <0.01
LP 16.80 (1, 98) <0.001 0.15
CPxLP 0.16 (1, 98) 0.69 <0.01
Implicit trust 0.95
CP 1.14 (1, 98) 0.29 0.01
LP 1.43 (1, 98) 0.23 0.01
CPxLP 0.00 (1, 98) 0.29 0.01
Reason-based Trust 0.88
CP 0.01 (1, 98) 0.94 <0.01
LP 23.67 (1, 98) <0.001 0.20
CPxLP 0.00 (1, 98) 0.95 <0.01
Antagonistic climate 0.89
CP 7.62 (1, 98) <0.01 0.07
LP 4.47 (1, 98) 0.04 0.04
CPxLP 1.73 (1, 98) 0.19 0.02
Service climate 0.88
CP 1.08 (1, 98) 0.30 0.01
LP 26.69 (1, 98) <0.001 0.21
CPxLP 0.30 (1, 98) 0.59 <0.01
Enforced compliance 0.89
CP 4.56 (1, 98) 0.04 0.04
LP 3.30 (1, 98) 0.07 0.03
CPxLP 0.23 (1, 98) 0.63 <0.01
Voluntary cooperation 0.81
CP 2.73 (1, 98) 0.13 0.02
LP 10.72 (1, 98) 0.001 0.10
CPxLP 0.06 (1, 98) 0.81 <0.01
Intended insurance fraud
CP 2.03 (1, 98) 0.16 0.02
LP 0.00 (1, 98) 0.99 <0.01
CPxLP 1.46 (1, 98) 0.23 0.02

α, Cronbach α; CP, main effect coercive power; LP, main effect legitimate power; CPxLP, interaction effect of coercive and legitimate power.