Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 18;8:5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00005

Table 8.

Study 4: Mediation analysis from power to insurance fraud intention (IFI; standard errors in parentheses).

Path coefficients Indirect effects
To IFI To IT To RBT To AC To SC To EC To VC Estimate Sobel Z Symmetric 95% CI
From covercive power (CP) −18.96 (7.39) 0.36 (0.32) −0.02 (0.25) 0.94 (0.35) −0.32 (0.29) 0.72 (0.34) −0.45 (0.29)
From legitimate power (LP) 1.83 (7.86) 0.42 (0.31) 1.24 (0.25) −0.80 (0.35) 1.51 (0.29) 0.60 (0.34) 0.95 (0.29)
From implicit trust (IT) 4.10 (2.43)
From reason-based trust (RBT) −7.99 (4.74)
From antagonistic climate (AC) 2.23 (2.78)
From service climate (SC) 1.45 (4.46)
From enforced compliance (EC) 6.89 (2.32)
From voluntary cooperation (VC) 0.76 (3.19)
CP→IT→IFI 1.46 (1.75) 0.936 −0.69; 4.77
LP→IT→IFI 1.72 (1.81) 1.056 −0.51; 5.13
CP→RBT→IFI 0.15 (2.38) 0.080 −3.70; 4.21
LP→RBT→IFI −9.89 (6.14) −1.596 −20.80; −0.44
CP→AC→IFI 2.10 (2.89) 0.769 −2.09; 7.34
LP→AC→IFI −1.77 (2.51) −0.076 −6.31; 1.79
CP→SC→IFI −0.46 (1.98) −0.311 −4.08; 2.31
LP→SC→IFI 2.19 (6.89) 0.032 −8.62; 13.70
CP→EC→IFI 4.99 (3.09) 1.724 0.77; 10.64
LP→EC→IFI 4.16 (2.85) 1.517 0.28; 9.38
CP→VC→IFI −0.35 (1.74) −1.375 −3.43; 2.39
LP→VC→IFI 0.73 (3.15) 0.238 −4.29; 6.02