Table 8.
Study 4: Mediation analysis from power to insurance fraud intention (IFI; standard errors in parentheses).
| Path coefficients | Indirect effects | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To IFI | To IT | To RBT | To AC | To SC | To EC | To VC | Estimate | Sobel Z | Symmetric 95% CI | |
| From covercive power (CP) | −18.96 (7.39) | 0.36 (0.32) | −0.02 (0.25) | 0.94 (0.35) | −0.32 (0.29) | 0.72 (0.34) | −0.45 (0.29) | |||
| From legitimate power (LP) | 1.83 (7.86) | 0.42 (0.31) | 1.24 (0.25) | −0.80 (0.35) | 1.51 (0.29) | 0.60 (0.34) | 0.95 (0.29) | |||
| From implicit trust (IT) | 4.10 (2.43) | |||||||||
| From reason-based trust (RBT) | −7.99 (4.74) | |||||||||
| From antagonistic climate (AC) | 2.23 (2.78) | |||||||||
| From service climate (SC) | 1.45 (4.46) | |||||||||
| From enforced compliance (EC) | 6.89 (2.32) | |||||||||
| From voluntary cooperation (VC) | 0.76 (3.19) | |||||||||
| CP→IT→IFI | 1.46 (1.75) | 0.936 | −0.69; 4.77 | |||||||
| LP→IT→IFI | 1.72 (1.81) | 1.056 | −0.51; 5.13 | |||||||
| CP→RBT→IFI | 0.15 (2.38) | 0.080 | −3.70; 4.21 | |||||||
| LP→RBT→IFI | −9.89 (6.14) | −1.596 | −20.80; −0.44 | |||||||
| CP→AC→IFI | 2.10 (2.89) | 0.769 | −2.09; 7.34 | |||||||
| LP→AC→IFI | −1.77 (2.51) | −0.076 | −6.31; 1.79 | |||||||
| CP→SC→IFI | −0.46 (1.98) | −0.311 | −4.08; 2.31 | |||||||
| LP→SC→IFI | 2.19 (6.89) | 0.032 | −8.62; 13.70 | |||||||
| CP→EC→IFI | 4.99 (3.09) | 1.724 | 0.77; 10.64 | |||||||
| LP→EC→IFI | 4.16 (2.85) | 1.517 | 0.28; 9.38 | |||||||
| CP→VC→IFI | −0.35 (1.74) | −1.375 | −3.43; 2.39 | |||||||
| LP→VC→IFI | 0.73 (3.15) | 0.238 | −4.29; 6.02 | |||||||