Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 7;159(2):377–384. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-3040-9

Table 3.

How the then-test of EQ-5D domains compare with baseline assessment

Better Similar Worse
ENTIRE SAMPLE (n = 73)
 Then-test mobility (n = 72) 3 67 2
 Then-test self-care (n = 72) 2 69 1
 Then-test activity (n = 73) 12 50 11
 Then-test pain (n = 70) 14 46 10
 Then-test anxiety (n = 72) 12 49 11
MIC IMPROVED (n = 14)
 Then-test mobility (n = 14) 1 12 1
 Then-test self-care (n = 14) 2 11 1
 Then-test activity (n = 14) 2 10 2
 Then-test pain (n = 14) 2 10 2
 Then-test anxiety (n = 14) 7 5 2
UNCHANGED (n = 43)
 Then-test mobility (n = 43) 1 42 0
 Then-test self-care (n = 43) 0 43 0
 Then-test activity (n = 43) 10 26 7
 Then-test pain (n = 41) 11 27 3
 Then-test anxiety (n = 42) 3 33 6
MIC DETERIORATED (n = 16)
 Then-test mobility (n = 15) 1 13 1
 Then-test self-care (n = 15) 0 15 0
 Then-test activity (n = 16) 0 14 2
 Then-test pain (n = 15) 1 9 5
 Then-test anxiety (n = 16) 2 11 3

Better in this context refer to that the then-test indicate fewer symptoms/problems than the baseline assessment