Table 1. Relative contributions of number and cumulative area on classification.
Group | Number weight (s.e.) | Cumulative area weight (s.e.) | Observations |
---|---|---|---|
Monkeys | 0.126*** | 0.027 | 380 |
(0.027) | (0.143) | ||
4-5-year-olds | 0.381*** | 0.095** | 864 |
(0.067) | (0.034) | ||
Tsimane' adults | 0.681*** | 0.309*** | 714 |
(0.081) | (0.054) | ||
US adults | 0.805*** | 0.062 | 2,436 |
(0.121) | (0.091) |
Note: *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.
Beta weights (and s.e.) from mixed effects logistic regressions predicting ‘category choice' using ‘number' and ‘cumulative area' stimulus values as predictor variables and subject as a random effect. The coefficients have been centred but not standardized. The total number of probe observations is shown for each group (US adults: n=21, observations per subject=116; US 4-5-year-olds: n=27, observations per subject=32; Tsimane' adults: n=51, observations per subject=14; Monkeys: n=2, observations per subject=176 and 204).