Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 16;8:13968. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13968

Table 1. Relative contributions of number and cumulative area on classification.

Group Number weight (s.e.) Cumulative area weight (s.e.) Observations
Monkeys 0.126*** 0.027 380
  (0.027) (0.143)  
4-5-year-olds 0.381*** 0.095** 864
  (0.067) (0.034)  
Tsimane' adults 0.681*** 0.309*** 714
  (0.081) (0.054)  
US adults 0.805*** 0.062 2,436
  (0.121) (0.091)  

Note: *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.

Beta weights (and s.e.) from mixed effects logistic regressions predicting ‘category choice' using ‘number' and ‘cumulative area' stimulus values as predictor variables and subject as a random effect. The coefficients have been centred but not standardized. The total number of probe observations is shown for each group (US adults: n=21, observations per subject=116; US 4-5-year-olds: n=27, observations per subject=32; Tsimane' adults: n=51, observations per subject=14; Monkeys: n=2, observations per subject=176 and 204).