Table 2.

Multinomial Logistic Regression Models Predicting Low- and High-Risk Drinking

	Women				Men
Variable	Low-risk drinking (n = 469)		High-risk drinking (n = 156)		Low-risk drinking (n = 605)		High-risk drinking (n = 312)
	RRR	95% CI	RRR	95% CI	RRR	95% CI	RRR	95% CI
Agea	0.99	0.96, 1.01	0.95	0.92, 0.98	0.97	0.96, 0.99	1.01	0.99, 1.03
Race/ethnicity: NHW	0.52	0.29, 0.93	0.76	0.35, 1.65	1.07	0.61, 1.86	1.04	0.55, 1.97
Education: >high school	1.43	0.79, 2.58	2.03	0.88, 4.65	1.34	0.80, 2.24	1.30	0.73, 2.31
Income: >200% FPLa	0.94	0.54, 1.62	0.43	0.20, 0.93	0.97	0.62, 1.52	2.10	1.29, 3.42
Sexual orientation: gay or lesbian	0.50	0.29, 0.86	0.53	0.27, 1.05	0.64	0.38, 1.07	1.31	0.68, 2.49
Transgender	0.66	0.32, 1.36	0.75	0.30, 1.91	0.24	0.10, 0.61	0.27	0.09, 0.80
Day-to-day discrimination	1.03	0.79, 1.34	1.06	0.76, 1.50	1.16	0.89, 1.52	1.46	1.10, 1.92
Identity stigma	1.16	0.85, 1.59	1.19	0.82, 1.71	0.87	0.71, 1.07	1.06	0.85, 1.32
Current smoker	0.60	0.29, 1.25	2.87	1.34, 6.12	0.62	0.33, 1.16	1.90	1.03, 3.51
Recovering from addictiona	0.08	0.04, 0.19	0.10	0.04, 0.23	0.12	0.07, 0.23	0.39	0.22, 0.70
Perceived stress	0.60	0.43, 0.84	0.65	0.42, 0.99	0.73	0.54, 0.97	0.88	0.62, 1.25
Social support	1.22	0.99, 1.51	1.60	1.20, 2.12	1.33	1.11, 1.60	1.08	0.90, 1.30

Note: CI = confidence interval; FPL = federal poverty level; NHW = non-Hispanic white; RRR = relative risk ratio. Bold typeface indicates effect with 95% CI not containing 1. All estimates were computed using survey weights.

^aWald tests showed significant (p < .05) differences in RRRs between high-risk women and high-risk men.