Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 13;57(Suppl 1):S84–S94. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw169

Table 1.

Fit Statistics for Latent Profile Analysis Solutions with 2–7 Clusters

Model AIC BIC Entropy LMR LRT
2 Classes 84,127.039 84,289.546 .959 p < .001
3 Classes 81,150.535 81,382.689 .928 p = .004
4 Classes 78,627.923 78,929.723 .965 p = .011
5 Classes 77,066.396 77,437.842 .962 p = .280
6 Classes 76,297.706 76,738.798 .931 p = .417
7 Classes 75,601.979 76,112.717 .926 p = .356

Note: AIC = Akaike information criterion (lower values indicate better fit); BIC = Bayesian information criterion (lower values indicate better fit); LMR LRT = Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test (significance indicates better fit compared with a solution with one fewer cluster).