Table 3.
Model I | Model II | Model III | Model IV | Model V | Model VI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age-adjusted | Model I + Psychological demand | Model I + Job control | Model I + Social support | Model I + Reward | Model I + Job control, reward and social support | |
Contributiona % (95% CI) | REF | −24 (−40;−6) | 9 (−3; 20) | 14 (−3; 24) | 24 (9; 38) | 23 (5; 40) |
Mean differences (95% CI) | ||||||
Household income ($/year) | ||||||
≥100 000 | REF | REF | REF | REF | REF | REF |
60 000–99 999 | 0.32 (−0.10; 0.74) | 0.61 (0.21; 1.01)** | 0.28 (−0.13; 0.70) | 0.25 (−0.16; 0.67) | 0.19 (−0.22; 0.61) | 0.22 (−0.20; 0.63) |
40 000–59 999 | 0.62 (0.16; 1.07)** | 0.93 (0.49; 1.37)** | 0.56 (0.10; 1.03)* | 0.55 (0.10; 1.01)* | 0.32 (−0.13; 0.78) | 0.39 (−0.07; 0.85) |
0–39 999 | 1.26 (0.79; 1.73)*** | 1.56 (1.11; 2.02)*** | 1.15 (0.66; 1.63)*** | 1.09 (0.62; 1.55)*** | 0.95 (0.48; 1.42)*** | 0.96 (0.48; 1.45)*** |
Psychological demand (tertiles) | ||||||
0–7.2 | REF | |||||
7.3–10 | 0.92 (0.59; 1.26)*** | |||||
>10 | 2.44 (2.05; 2.83)*** | |||||
Job control (tertiles) | ||||||
≥25 | REF | REF | ||||
21–24.9 | −0.04 (−0.41; 0.32) | −0.20 (−0.57; 0.18) | ||||
0–20.9 | 0.46 (0.06; 0.85)* | 0.00 (−0.42; 0.42) | ||||
Social support at work | ||||||
≥56 | REF | REF | ||||
48–55 | −0.01 (−0.38; 0.36) | −0.21 (−0.61; 0.19) | ||||
0–47 | 1.28 (0.89; 1.68)*** | 0.65 (0.19; 1.11)** | ||||
Working alone | 0.35 (−0.48; 1.18) | −0.15 (−1.10; 0.79) | ||||
Reward (tertiles) | ||||||
>16 | REF | REF | ||||
14–16 | 0.30 (−0.07; 0.66) | 0.19 (−0.20; 0.58) | ||||
0–13 | 1.71 (0.34; 2.08)*** | 1.37 (0.94; 1.80)*** |
*p-value <0.05, **p-value <0.01, ***p-value <0.001
aContribution calculated with this formula, (MDbasic – MDadjusted)/(MDbasic), where MDbasic = Mean differences for age-adjusted models and MDadjusted = Mean differences for models adjusted for work variables at each steps for the 0–39 999$ per year category of household income. Jackknife method was used to calculate 95% IC of the contributions