Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec;37(4):153–175.

Table 3.

Criteria to determine clinical usefulness of candidate biomarkers

  1. Noninvasive – utilising easily accessible sample

  2. Provide more information than the currently criteria

  3. Rapid results with high sensitivity and specificity for AKI preferably on automated platforms

  4. Cut-off values distinguishing between normal and abnormal renal function

  5. Differentiate AKI subtypes (pre-renal, intrinsic, post-renal)

  6. Differentiate between AKI and CKD

  7. Differentiate AKI from other causes of Acute kidney disease (UTI, glomerulonephritis, interstitial nephritis)

  8. Identify AKI aetiology (toxic, ischaemic, septic or combinations)

  9. To be specific for renal injury in the presence of co-morbidities

  10. To predict and quantify the severity of renal disease

  11. To allow an accurate estimation of the onset of renal injury

  12. To guide therapy and monitor response to interventions

  13. To monitor the course of AKI

  14. To aid prognosis i.e. recovery, the need for RRT, mortality