Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0169831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169831

Table 1. Study group characteristics by age and feeding regimen.

Differences in group means were tested with ANOVA and for distributions in groups by chi-square test for the 4- and 12-month olds, respectively.

4 months old 12 months old
EF SF BFR p-value groups EF SF BFR (at 4 month) p-value groups
Numbers in basic studya 76 73 73 73 68 72
Numbers with sequencingb 46 41 37 59 55 52
Boysb (%) 52 56 40 0.387 49 49 48 0.993
Lengthb (cm) 64 (64–65) 64 (63–65) 64 (63–65) 0.555 76.5 (75.8–77.1) 76.0 (75.4–76.7) 75.5 (74.9–76.1) 0.108
Length gain 0–12 mob, cm 26.2 (25.5–26.9) 25.3 (24.8–25.9) 24.6 (24.0–25.2) 0.002
Weightb (kg) 6.9 (6.7–6.9) 6.9 (6.6–7.2) 6.7 (6.5–6.9) 0.450 10.2 (9.8–10.5) 10.1 (9.8–10.4) 9.9 (9.6–10.1) 0.131
Weight gain 0–12 mo, kg 6.7 (6.4–7.0) 6.6 (6.2–6.9) 6.2 (5.9–6.5) 0.062
Caesarean section (%) 18.8 17.5 7.5 0.087
Probiotic dropsc (%) 6.5 2.4 13.5 0.165 0 0 0
Antibioticsd (%) 0 0 0 13.3d 10.2d 6.7d 0.627
Total number of quality filtered sequences (mean) 54 459 59 600 58 613 0.322 51 896 48 858 47 108 0.336

a) Remaining infants out of 80 included 0–2 mo old infants at study start. Those who left between recruitment and study start did this for time constraints.

b) The numbers refers to infants with oral swabs analyzed for Illumina MiSeq sequencing of the v3-v4 hypervariable regions of 16S rDNA. The lower numbers at 4 month, compared to numbers included in the basic study, is due to that the basic study was running when inclusion to the present study began. The lower numbers at 12 mo is due to that the child did not cooperate for swabbing.

c) These children (5, 1, 3 infants, respectively) reported having taken probiotic drops (L. reuteri) during the last several months. No significant difference was seen in phyla, genera or species prevalences between those who reported intake and those who reported no intake.

d) These children (3, 5, 6 infants, respectively) had taken antibiotics once between 7–12 mo of age but with no closer specification when it was taken. No significant difference was seen in phyla, genera or species prevalences between those who reported intake and those who reported no intake.