. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):398–405. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001736

Table 4.

Sensitivity, Specificity, Negative and Positive Predictive Value of hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP

	MI	No MI	Odds Ratio (95% CI)	Sensitivity (95% CI)	Specificity (95% CI)	PPV (95% CI)	NPV (95% CI)	Likelihood Ratio
hs-cTnT > 14 ng/L	21	217	3.47 (1.56 – 6.98)	0.70 (0.51 – 0.85)	0.60 (0.56 – 0.64)	0.09 (0.06 – 0.13)	0.97 (0.95 – 0.99)	1.74
hs-cTnT < 14 ng/L	9	323	3.47 (1.56 – 6.98)	0.70 (0.51 – 0.85)	0.60 (0.56 – 0.64)	0.09 (0.06 – 0.13)	0.97 (0.95 – 0.99)	1.74
NT-proBNP >300 ng/L	16	173	2.42 (1.16 – 5.09)	0.53 (0.34 – 0.72)	0.68 (0.64 – 0.72)	0.08 (0.05 – 0.13)	0.96 (0.94 – 0.98)	1.67
NT-proBNP <300 ng/L	14	367	2.42 (1.16 – 5.09)	0.53 (0.34 – 0.72)	0.68 (0.64 – 0.72)	0.08 (0.05 – 0.13)	0.96 (0.94 – 0.98)	1.67
NT-proBNP >108 ng/L	26	293	5.48 (1.89 – 15.90)	0.87 (0.69– 0.96)	0.46 (0.41 – 0.50)	0.08 (0.05 – 0.11)	0.98 (0.96 – 1.00)	1.60
NT-proBNP <108 ng/L	4	247	5.48 (1.89 – 15.90)	0.87 (0.69– 0.96)	0.46 (0.41 – 0.50)	0.08 (0.05 – 0.11)	0.98 (0.96 – 1.00)	1.60