Table 4. Prevailing approaches: Single risk and cumulative risk.

	Emotional Stroop: Adaptation		Arrows: Inhibitory Control		Arrows: Switching Ability		Emotional Stroop: Inhibitory Control
	β	p	β	p	β	p	β	p
Single risk
Child abuse	0.11	.057	0.01	.816	0.05	.437	0.08	.182
Community violence	0.11	.071	0.09	.144	0.19**	.002	−0.05	.437
Living below poverty line	−0.03	.674	0.19**	.011	0.16*	.030	0.15*	.044
Log10 income to needs	0.04	.614	−0.31**	.000	−0.14*	.053	−0.05	.475
Cumulative risk
Total no. of adversities	0.06	.428	.12	.102	0.15*	.047	0.07	.326

Note: A test of the single risks approach was represented in unadjusted models in which co-occurring types of adversity were not controlled (e.g., child abuse without controlling for poverty). The child abuse, community violence, and poverty variables were dichotomized and summed to produce a score of the total number of adversities experienced to represent the cumulative risk approach. Sex was included as a covariate in all analyses.

^*p ≤ .05.

^**p ≤ .01.