Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 8;116(2):211–217. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.403

Table 4. Comparison of NF1 and control breast cancers by grade, pT class, lymph node and receptor statuses and the proliferative index Ki-67.

  NF1 group, n (%)a Control group, n (%)a OR (95% CI)b P-value
Total 26 130    
Tumour grade        
 I 1 (3.8%) 21 (18.4%) 2.37 (1.00–5.61) P=0.050
 II 11 (42.3%) 49 (43.0%)    
 III 14 (53.8%) 44 (38.6%)    
 Unknown 0 16    
pT class        
 1 11 (42.3%) 78 (66.1%) 2.87 (1.19–6.90) P=0.019
 2 13 (50.0%) 34 (28.8%)    
 3 1 (3.8%) 6 (5.1%)    
 4 1 (3.8%) 0 (0.0%)    
 Unknown 0 12    
Lymph node status        
 N0 11 (44.0%) 53 (55.2%) 1.53 (0.65–3.61) P=0.332
 N1 10 (40.0%) 30 (31.3%)    
 N2 3 (12.0%) 10 (10.4%)    
 N3 1 (4.0%) 3 (3.1%)    
 Unknown 1 34    
Oestrogen receptor status        
 Positive (10–100%) 12 (46.2%) 91 (79.1%) 0.21 (0.07–0.53) P=0.001
 Negative (0–10%) 14 (53.8%) 24 (20.9%)    
 Unknown 0 15    
Progesterone receptor status        
 Positive (10–100%) 9 (34.6%) 90 (78.3%) 0.10 (0.03–0.29) P<0.001
 Negative (0–10%) 17 (65.4%) 25 (21.7%)    
 Unknown 0 15    
HER2 amplification        
 Yes 8 (30.8%) 11 (9.6%) 5.46 (1.67–20.11) P=0.006
 No 18 (69.2%) 104 (90.4%)    
 Unknown 0 15    
Triple-negative        
 Yes 5 (19.2%) 15 (13.0%) 1.65 (0.48–5.09) P=0.399
 No 21 (80.8%) 100 (87.0%)    
 Unknown 0 15    
Ki-67 status        
 Mean (s.d.) 33.3% (22.8) 29.3% (22.5)   P=0.334
 Unknown 0 15    

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; NF1=neurofibromatosis 1; OR=odds ratio.

a

Percentage calculated for cases with known status only.

b

Odds ratios and 95% CIs are derived from generalised mixed effects models with NF1 diagnosis as the exposure variable, and a grouping variable that indexes matched sets as a random effect. Therefore, ORs illustrate the odds of NF1 patients compared with controls for each outcome.