Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 19;7:40964. doi: 10.1038/srep40964

Table 3. Receiver operating characteristic curves for quantitative and qualitative parameters in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions.

Variables   Cut-off value Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) AUROC 95%CI P
Emean kPa 36.05 85.1 (40/47) 96.6 (172/178) 94.2 (212/225) 87.0 (40/46) 96.1 (172/179) 0.943 0.896–0.990 <0.001
m/s 3.30 85.1 (40/47) 95.5 (170/178) 93.3 (210/225) 83.3 (40/48) 96.0 (170/177) 0.931 0.882–0.981 <0.001
ESD kPa 17.90 93.6·(44/47) 97.8· (174/178) 96.9· (218/225) 91.7· (44/48) 98.3· (174/177) 0.936 0.866–1.000 <0.001
m/s 0.91 93.6 (44/47) 95.5 (170/178) 95.1 (214/225) 84.6 (44/52) 98.3 (170/173) 0.936 0.866–1.000 <0.001
Eratio kPa 3.67 76.6 (36/47) 91.0 (162/178) 88.0 (198/225) 69.2 (36/52) 93.6 (162/173) 0.872 0.809–0.936 <0.001
m/s 1.87 76.6 (36/47) 91.0 (162/178) 88.0 (198/225) 69.2 (36/52) 93.6 (162/173) 0.863* 0.794–0.932 <0.001
Color pattern   2–3 89.4 (42/47) 97.2 (173/178) 95.6 (215/225) 89.4 (42/47) 97.2 (173/178) 0.957 0.914–1.000 <0.001

Emean = the mean elasticity; ESD = standard deviation of the elasticity; Eratio = the ratio elasticity; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value; CI = confidence interval; AUROC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

*There are statistically significant difference between AUROC of color patterns and Eratio in speed mode (P = 0.03 < 0.05).

·ESD expressed in KPa obtained the highest Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy, PPV, NPV compared with the Eratio with statistically significant difference. (Corresponding P = 0.008 for Sensitivity comparison, P = 0.002 for Specificity comparison, P = 0.000 for Accuracy comparison, P = 0.006 for PPV comparison, P = 0.030 for NPV comparison, all P < 0.05).