Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 28;54(1):28–38. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12644

Table 2.

The sensitivity of forest composition to climate change and disturbance. Values are based on iLand simulations and indicate means and standard deviations (SD) over averaged landscape values (i.e. average species shares in the landscape) of all respective scenarios

Disturbance Initial state Baseline climate Climate change
Year 0 Year 100 Year 1000 Year 100 Year 1000
Mean Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
A. alba (%) No 3·3 0·0 13·1 0·0 3·6 0·1 1·3 1·0
Yes 2·9 3·4 0·1 7·8 1·8 3·6 0·2 0·9 0·8
C. betulus (%) No <0·1 0·0 0·0 0·0 0·2 0·1 0·7 0·2
Yes <0·1 <0·1 0·0 0·1 0·1 0·4 0·3 2·8 1·5
F. sylvatica (%) No 34·7 0·0 34·4 0·0 37·9 1·2 67·3 9·0
Yes 39·3 27·7 4·0 22·2 4·1 31·6 3·8 49·7 11·5
L. decidua (%) No 12·0 0·1 7·9 0·0 12·4 0·9 2·5 0·6
Yes 10·7 12·5 0·3 8·4 0·8 13·0 1·0 4·6 1·2
P. abies (%) No 43·2 0·1 21·5 0·1 36·8 0·7 2·2 0·2
Yes 38·5 39·8 3·0 18·2 2·2 32·7 3·1 2·7 0·2
Q. petraea (%) No 0·1 0·0 0·9 0·0 0·4 0·2 16·3 7·1
Yes <0·1 0·1 0·0 0·7 0·1 0·6 0·3 15·8 5·9
Q. robur (%) No 0·1 0·0 0·5 0·0 0·3 0·1 4·6 1·3
Yes <0·1 0·1 0·0 0·5 0·0 0·4 0·2 6·6 1·9
Other tree species (%) No 6·7 0·0 21·8 0·0 8·6 0·3 5·2 0·5
Yes 8·6 16·3 7·0 42·1 8·7 17·7 6·2 16·9 6·6