. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Jan 1;19(1):7–14. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1018

Table 4.

Pearson Correlations Between Adverse Effects and Appearance Scales

	Adverse Effects	Eyes	Eyelashes	Upper Eyelids	Lower Eyelids
Adverse effects
R	1	−.255^a	−.280^a	−.300^b	−.362^b
P Value	…	.015	.049	.005	.001
Participants, No.	93	90	50	85	80
Eyes overall
R	−.255^a	1	.440^b	.672^b	.588^b
P Value	.015		.000	.000	.000
Participants, No.	90	173	71	152	151
Eyelashes
R	−.280^a	.440^b	1	.285^a	.426^b
P Value	.049	.000	…	.024	.001
Participants, No.	50	71	71	63	55
Uppereyelids
R	−.300^b	.672^b	.285^a	1	.645^b
P Value	.005	.000	.024	…	.000
Participants, No.	85	152	63	155	137
Lower eyelids
R	−.362^b	.588^b	.426^b	.645^b ^b	1
P Value	.001	.000	.001	.000	…
Participants, No.	80	151	55	137	231
Facial appearance
R	−.236^a	.608^b	.274^a	.612^b	.624^b
P Value	.024	.000	.021	.000	.000
Participants, No.	92	172	70	153	228
Psychological function
R	−.416^a	.431^b		.480^b	.589^b
P Value	.014	.000		.000	.000
Participants, No.	34	80		74	82
Social function
R	−.357^a	.251^a		.378^b	.369^b
P Value	.038	.024		.001	.001
Participants, No.	34	81		75	83

Abbreviations: R, correlation between scales; ellipses, not applicable or no data available.

Correlation significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Correlation significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)