Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2016 Jun 29;88(2):544–554. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12583

Table 2.

Hierarchical Regression Results for the Prediction of Maternal Frontal EEG Asymmetry

β t-value, sig Change R2
Step 1 .20
Child EEG Asymmetry .03 t (31) = .14, ns
Maternal Negativity −.44 t (31) = −2.55, p<.05
Step 2 .12
Child EEG Asymmetry .07 t (31) = .41, ns
Maternal Negativity −.09 t (31) = −.41, ns
Child Negativity −.48 t (31) = −2.29, p<.05
F(30) = 4.72, p < .001 (one-tailed); R2 = .32

Note. Results remain the same when controlling for mother’s age and child’s age.