Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2016 Jun 29;88(2):544–554. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12583

Table 3.

Hierarchical Regression Results for the Prediction of Child Frontal EEG Asymmetry

B t-value, sig Change R2
Step 1 .04
Maternal EEG Asymmetry .13 t (31) = .60, ns
Child Negativity −.10 t (31) = −.49, ns
Step 2 .15
Maternal EEG Asymmetry .08 t (31) = .41, ns
Child Negativity .19 t (31) = .75, ns
Maternal Negativity −.46 t (31) = −1.94, p<.05
F(30) = 1.75, p = .09 (one-tailed); R2 = .19

Note. Results remain the same when controlling for mother’s age and child’s age.