. 2017 Jan 20;7:40942. doi: 10.1038/srep40942

Table 2. Summary of the gene-set enrichment analysis of porcine blood cDC transcriptomes versus orthologous human and mouse cDC subsets.

Porcine blood cell type Gene sets	Pairwise comparisons between mouse or human cell types	Enriched in	Enrichment Score (ES)^a	P - value^b	False Discovery Rate (q)^b
CD1⁻ vs CD14⁺ up	Human cDC1 vs CD14⁺ cMo	cDC1	0.46	0	0.002
CD1⁻ vs CD14⁺ up	Mouse cDC1 vs Ly6c⁺ cMo	cDC1	0.50	0.171	0.299
CD1⁻ vs CD14⁺ down	Human cDC1 vs CD14⁺ cMo	cMo^c	−0.67	0.005	0.007
CD1⁻ vs CD14⁺ down	Mouse cDC1 vs Ly6c⁺ cMo	cMo	−0.59	0.113	0.266
CD1⁺ vs CD14⁺ up	Human cDC2 vs CD14⁺ cMo	cDC2	0.49	0.003	0.005
CD1⁺ vs CD14⁺ up	Mouse cDC2 vs Ly6c⁺ cMo	cDC2	0.53	0.021	0.013
CD1⁺ vs CD14⁺ down	Human cDC2 vs CD14⁺ cMo	cMo	−0.64	0	0.002
CD1⁺ vs CD14⁺ down	Mouse cDC2 vs Ly6c⁺ cMo	cMo	−0.55	0.025	0.057

^aThe ES is calculated out of a possible maximum of 1 and minimum of −1.

^bValues of p ≤ 0.1 and q ≤ 0.25 are considered to indicate significant enrichment.

^cClassical monocytes.