Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 20;7:40837. doi: 10.1038/srep40837

Table 3. Summary of effect result within different type of sham electro-acupuncture methods and electro-acupuncture indications.

electro-acupuncture (EA) indications The type of sham EA method
The NO. of reference included
Sham EA type A 26 control groups Sham EA type B 7 control groups Sham EA type C 7 control groups Sham EA type D 6 control groups Sham EA type F 7 control groups Sham EA type L 17 control groups Sham EA type M 3 control groups Sham EA type N 4 control groups Sham EA type O 14 control groups Sham EA type Q 10 control groups
Pain 32 RCTs T > C 8 comparisons ND 7 comparisons T > C 3 comparisons ND 1 comparison T > C 1 comparison ND 3 comparisons T > C 1 comparison   ND 2 comparisons T > C 1 comparison T > C 1 comparison T > C 1 comparison ND 2 comparisons ND 2 comparisons T > C? 1 comparison T > C 16 ND 17 T > C? 1
Obesity 4 RCTs     T > C 1 comparison     T > C 2 comparisons     T > C 1 comparison ND 1 comparison   T > C 4 ND 1
Anesthesia 8 RCTs T > C 2 comparisons ND 1 comparison T < C 1 comparison         ND 2 comparisons T > C? 1 comparison     T > C 1 comparison   T > C 3 ND 3 T < C 1 T > C? 1
Stroke 7 RCTs ND 1 comparison ND 1 comparison T > C 1 comparison T > C 1 comparison ND 1 comparison           T > C 1 comparison ND 1 comparison T > C 3 ND 4
Depression 6 RCTs   T > C 2 comparisons ND 1 comparison       T > C 1 comparison ND 1 comparison   ND 1 comparison   T > C 3 ND 3
Primary dysmenorrhea and (or) Menstrual Pain 4 RCTs         T > C 2 comparisons ND 2 comparisons T > C 2 comparisons ND 2 comparisons         T > C 4 ND 4
Substance abuse 3 RCTs       T > C 1 comparison       T > C 1 comparison   ND 1 comparison T > C 2 ND 1
Healthy 3 RCTs       T > C 1 comparison   T > C 1 comparison ND 2 comparisons         T > C 2 ND 2
Osteoarthritis 2 RCTs T > C 2 comparisons                   T > C 2
Migraine 2 RCTs         T > C 1 comparison ND 1 comparison         T > C 1 ND 1
Nausea and Vomiting 2 RCTs         T > C 1 comparison       T > C 1 comparison T > C 1 comparison T > C 3
Postoperative ileus 2 RCTs                 T > C 2 comparisons   T > C 2
Insomnia 2 RCTs ND 1 comparison             ND 1 comparison   T > C 1 comparison T > C 1 ND 2
benign prostate hyperplasia 2 RCTs           T > C 1 comparison     T > C 1 comparison   T > C 2
Diabetic mellitus 2 RCTs ND 1 comparison             T > C 1 comparison     T > C 1 ND 1
Carpal tunnel syndrome 1 RCTs                   T > C 2 comparisons T > C 2
Rheumatoid arthritis 1 RCTs       ND 1 comparison             ND 1
Whiplash-associated disorders 1 RCTs             T > C 1 comparison       T > C 1
Constipation 1 RCTs           T > C 1 comparison         T > C 1
Multiple sclerosis 1 RCTs                 T > C 1 comparison   T > C 1
Tinnitus 1 RCTs ND 1 comparison                   ND 1
Auditory hallucination 1 RCTs                 T > C 1 comparison   T > C 1
ADHD (Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) 1 RCTs     T > C 1 comparison               T > C 1
PCOS (Polycystic Ovary Syndrome) 1 RCTs                   ND 1 comparison ND 1
hot flushes in postmenopausal women 1 RCTs                 ND 1 comparison   ND 1
Postpartum Insufficient Lactation 1 RCTs         T > C 1 comparison           T > C 1
Cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury 1 RCTs     T > C 1 comparison               T > C 1
Stress-related symptoms 1 RCTs T > C 1 comparison                   T > C 1
The positive rate of efficacy result T > C 13 ND 12 T < C 1 T > C? 0 53.8% (14/26 comparisons) T > C 5 ND 3 62.5% (5/8 comparisons) T > C 5 ND 3 62.5% (5/8 comparisons) T > C 4 ND 2 66.7% (4/6 comparisons) T > C 5 ND 2 71.4% (5/7 comparisons) T > C 8 ND 9 T > C? 1 44.4% (8/18 comparisons) T > C 2 ND 1 66.7% (2/3 comparisons) T > C 3 ND 1 75% (3/4 comparisons) T > C 9 ND 5 64.3% (9/14 comparisons) T > C 5 ND 5 T > C? 1 45.5% (5/11 comparisons) T > C 59 ND 43 T < C 1 T > C? 2 57.1% (60/105 comparisons)

NOTE: T > C, EA treatment group was significantly superior to sham EA control group; ND, no difference between EA and sham EA group; T < C, real EA group was significantly inferior to sham EA group; T > C?, the efficacy result of trial was reported as “T > C” without conducting the between-group analysis and with the original data not available.