Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 19;16:7. doi: 10.1186/s12912-016-0199-6

Table 1.

Criteria and scoring for considered scales

Criteria and scoring NEECHAM Nu-DESC DOS
Context:
1 = Acute care environment
0 = other
1 1 1
Assessor:
1 = non-expert
0 = expert (e.g. physician)
1 1 1
Amount of patients under assessment
2 = over 150
1 = 100–150
0 = under 100
2 2 2
Usability
2 = short, incl. filling and scoring instructions
1 = long, incl. filling and scoring instructions
0 = long or no instructions
1 2 1
Process of development based on:
2 = DSM-III/ IV and is reported
1 = other and is reported
0 = no report of development
1
Delphi panel, correlates with DSM-III-R
2 2
Correlation validity:
correlation to the DSM-criteria
2 = r >0.60
1 = 0.40 < r < 0.60
0 = r < 0.40 or not reported
1
0.70, 0.543
2
0.714
0
not reported
Concurrent validity:
Correlation to the comparison scale
2 = r > 0.60
1 = 0.40 < r < 0.60
0 = r < 0.40 or not reported
2
0.87 MMSE1,3
2
0.67 MDAS2,4
2
0.63 CAM5
0.79 MMSE1,5
Discriminant validity:
1 = appropriately discriminates confusion
from non-confusion
0 = no discrimination or not reported
1
sensitivity 1.06
specificity .876
1
sensitivity .864
specificity .874
1
sensitivity .896
specificity .886
Internal Consistency: Cronbach’s α
2 = 0.70 < α < 0.90
1 = α > 0.9 or 0.60 < α < 0.70
0 = α < 0.60 or not reported
2
0.903
0
not reported
1
0.935
Interrater reliability: Cohen’s κ
2 = > 0.8
1 = 0.6 < κ < 0.8
0 = < 0.6 or not reported
1
0.653
2
0.894
0
not reported
Amount of validation to other languages
2 = 2 or over
1 = 1
0 = none or not mentioned
2 2 0
Total 13 17 11

1Mini-Mental State Exam, 2The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale, 3[19], 4[20], 5[27], 6[39]