Table 2.

Occurrence of SRH risks and use of SRH commodities and services

	RDS-Adjusted %
	Durban	Tete	Mombasa	Mysore
Currently using contraceptionb	N = 381	N = 244	N = 388	N = 381
Yes	91.3	86.2	98.4	95.8
Main contraception method usedc	N = 346	N = 212	371	373
Injectable contraceptives	29.7	42.8	25.9	0.0
Oral contraceptives	3.2	33.3	6.4	0.6
IUD	0.1	2.4	0.8	1.0
Implant	0.0	3.5	33.0	0.3
Condom	63.7	17.0	33.3	10.0
Female sterilization	3.2	0.9	0.6	88.2
Currently using a non-barrier modern contraceptive methodb	N = 378	N = 244	N = 379	N = 379
Yes	33.4	70.6	65.6	85.1
Ever used emergency contraception	N = 389	N = 298	N = 400	N = 455
Yes	27.9	13.4	38.1	2.4
Unwanted pregnancy in the last five years	N = 394	N = 301	N = 345	N = 458
Yes	37.6	7.5	30.6	8.0
Action taken for unwanted pregnancyd	N = 150	N = 19	N = 122	N = 43
Went to a health facility for an abortion	15.0	(35.9)a	21.9	(93.7)a
Kept the pregnancy	81.2	(64.1)a	70.8	(6.3)a
Went elsewhere for an abortion	3.8	(0.0) a	7.3	(0.0)a
Ever tested for cervical cancer	N = 400	N = 304	N = 399	N = 458
Yes	29.0	0.0	14.4	11.5
Ever tested for cervical cancere	N = 124	N = 144	N = 122	N = 337
Yes	43.8	0.0	21.1	13.6
Forced sex in the past 12 months	N = 393	N = 264	N = 399	N = 458
Yes	36.3	13.5	14.9	7.1
Condom use at last forced sex incidentf	N = 129	N = 38	N = 63	N = 39
Yes	47.5	(20.4)a	26.2	(38.5)a
Sought medical care for last forced sex incidentf	N = 121	N = 40	N = 62	N = 41
Yes	38.8	(40.2)a	34.4	(51.9)a
Used all services she neededg	N = 393	N = 272	N = 391	N = 428
Yes	19.4	32.7	40.9	25.7

^aBootstrap analysis was not possible because of too few observations in some categories. A weighted proportion was calculated instead

^bN: Excludes FSWs who reported they wanted to get pregnant, were pregnant or were infertile

^cN: Currently using contraception = Yes

^dN: Unwanted pregnancy in the last five years = Yes

^eN: Age > =30 years

^fN: Forced sex in the past 12 months = Yes

^gN: Was in need of at least one SRH service