Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 19;14:7. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0462-6

Table 3.

Recruitment costs by county, by active versus passive methods, and totals

Lee Giles Pulaski Washington Grayson Wise Wythe Montgomery Total
Cost- Active strategies ($)
 community research assistant 1,762 0 1,800 379 1,442 272 1,165 303 7,123
 university-affiliated research assistant 29 5,399 3,360 3,704 2,736 5,752 3,717 3,886 28,485
 travel time 0 970 815 2,145 1,860 3,180 1,793 0 10,763
 transportation 0 162 368 1,349 754 2,805 923 0 6,362
 other (festival fees, prizes) 0 10.00 70 0 0 75 0 25 180
Sub-total cost- Active strategies 1,791 6,541 6,312 7,578 6,792 12,214 7,599 4,222 52,912
Cost- Passive strategies ($)
 community research assistant 75 0 37 8 58 0 31 8 217
 university-affiliated research assistant 0 -a 68 72 107 130 90 0 467
 Newspaper ads 389 597 320 0 525 924 977 0 3,732
 Mailed postcards (to target pop) 0 0 128 2,613 235 131 131 0 3,238
Sub-total cost- Passive strategies 764 597 553 2,693 952 1,185 1,229 0 7654
Total cost- All strategies ($) 2,254 7,138 6,866 10,271 7,718 13,269 8,828 4,222 60,567
Cost per participant ($)
 Cost per screened participant 35 74 39 88 67 84 46 31 58
 Cost per enrolled participant 55 230 130 321 221 415 221 114 213
 Cost per participant
 screened via active
 strategies and enrolled
90 311 186 281 400 549 253 151 278
 Cost per participant
 screened via passive
 strategies and enrolled
22 60 29 539 51 119 122 1 118

amissing recruitment method