Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 19;15:12. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0590-3

Table 4.

Summary of significant correlations between the different instruments per group

Group Instrument EQ-5D-Y dimensions EQ-5D-Y VAS EQ-5D-Y Composite Score
Mobility LAM UA P/D WSU
MS PedsQL “Feelings” p = .02
−2.318b
PedsQL total p = .007
−2.682b
p = .041 Rho .199
SS PedsQL “Health and Activity” p < .001
16.7a
WeeFIM Mobility p < .001
22.12a
WeeFIM self-care p < .001
14.19a
PedsQL total p = .009
Rho .441
CI WeeFIM Mobility p = .01
9.19a
WeeFIM Self-care p = .013
8.69a
PedsQL total p = .002
−3.043b
p = .002
Rho-.523
WeeFIM total p = .024
Rho -.398
AI PedsQL “Health and Activity” p < .001
15.81a
PedsQL “I hurt” p < .001
26.78a
PedsQL “Feelings” p = .007
12.14a
WeeFIM Mobility p < .001
21.75a
WeeFIM Self-care p < .001
15.57a
FPS p < .001
29.76a
PedsQL total p = .006
10.335a
p < .001
Rho-.564
p < .001
Rho .635
WeeFIM total p < .001
Rho .525
p < .001
Rho-.659

aKruskal-Wallis H value

bMann–Whitney U z value

Significant p values are bolded