Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 8;31(1):2–23. doi: 10.1002/acp.3220

Table 2.

Imagination inflation studies of childhood events

Authors Participants Additional relevant conditions % of events with increased belief ratingsa Significant inflation effect Mean belief/recollection increase on 8‐point scalea Mean increase beyond scale midpointa
Garry et al. (1996) 38 college students (pre‐test ratings 1–4) 34% imagined 25% not imagined Mean ratings not tested
Paddock, Joseph et al. (1998) Study 1 98 college students (pre‐test ratings 1–4) 38% imaginedb 21% not imaginedb Yes
Paddock, Joseph et al. (1998) Study 2 106 middle aged adults No
Paddock et al. (1999) 94 college students (pre‐test ratings 1–4) 47% imagined 35% not imagined Yes
Heaps and Nash (1999) 55 college students Yes (1‐tailed test only) Belief No
0.44 imagined
0.18 not imagined
Clancy et al. (1999) 12 women with recovered memories Recovered memory status B/S (pre‐test ratings 1–4) range: 25–19% imagined Mean ratings not tested
12 controls 12% not imaginedb
Horselenberg et al. (2000) Study 1 34 college students No Belief (1–7) No
0.37 imagined
0.27 not imagined
Horselenberg et al. (2000) Study 2 45 college and high school students Yes Belief (1–7) No
0.51 imagined
−0.02 not imagined
Pezdek and Eddy (2001) 43 college students, 32 older adults Young versus old B/S (pre‐test ratings 1–4) 39% imagined No Belief (pretest ratings 1–4) No
25% not imagined 1.13 imagined
0.68 not imagined
Mazzoni and Memon (2003) 72 college students Improbable (skin) versus probable (tooth) event B/S; imagined versus exposed versus not imagined W/S Yes Belief range: Probable event:
0.86–0.42 imagined
N/Ac Improbable event: No
−0.30 to −1.34 exposed/not imagined
Sharman et al. (2004) 67 college students Imagined versus paraphrasing W/S; 0, 1, 3 or 5 repetitions W/S No Belief b All < 1.00 No
Pezdek et al. (2006) 145 college students High versus low plausible events W/S range: 38–21% imagined 28–23% not imagined Yes (high plausible event only) Belief range: 0.94–0.21 imagined No
0.39–0.22 not imagined
Sharman and Barnier (2008) 78 college students Positive versus negative events W/S Yes: Belief and Recollection (pre‐test ratings 1–4) Yes: Belief No: Recollection
Belief range:
3.64–3.52 imagined
2.22–1.90 not imagined
Recollection range: 3.09–2.90 imagined
1.50–1.13 not imagined
Sharman and Scoboria (2009) 60 college students Belief analysis: moderate versus low event plausibility W/S; Recollection analysis: high versus moderate versus low event plausibility W/S Yes: Belief and Recollection Belief range: (pretest ratings 1–4) Moderate and low plausibility events:
0.67–0.40 imagined
No: Belief
No: Recollection
0.18–0.16 not imagined
High plausibility events: N/Ac
Recollection range:
(pre‐test ratings 1–8)
1.14–0.08 imagined
0.61 to −0.04 not imagined
von Glahn et al. (2012) Study 2 60 college students Number of imagined details generated (0,3,6) W/S Yes Belief range: 0.30–0.21b imagined No
−0.04b not imagined
Bays et al. (2012) 135 college students Number of imaginings (0,1,5) W/S; High versus low plausibility events W/S No: Belief and Recollection Belief range: 0.13 to −0.08 imagined No
−0.18 to −0.33 not imagined
Recollection range: 0.34 to 0.04 imagined
−0.10 to −0.18 not imagined
Bays, Foley, and Zabrucky (2013) 151 college students Number of imaginings (0, 1, 5) W/S No Belief range: (pretest ratings 1–4)
1.26–1.05 imagined
0.69 not imagined
Marsh et al. (2014) Study 1 47 college students Imagined from first versus third person perspective W/S Yes (third person perspective only) Belief range: 1.11–0.47 imagined No
0.04 not imagined
Marsh et al. (2014) Study 2 64 college students As for Study 1 Yes (third person perspective only) Belief range: 0.64–0.20 imagined N/Ac
−0.17 not imagined

Cells left blank where relevant data not reported.

B/S = between‐subjects; W/S = within‐subjects.

a

Belief (confidence) and recollection ratings in listed studies are all on 1‐ to 8‐point scales unless otherwise specified; where ranges are given, means and percentages vary according to condition; scales include the following: Life Events Inventory (LEI: Garry et al., 1996) with authors' modified events; Autobiographical Beliefs and Memory Questionnaire (ABMQ: Scoboria et al., 2004).

b

Estimated from published figures.

c

N/A = not applicable as all mean pre‐test ratings are above or near midpoint.