Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 20;19(1):129–137. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.687

Table 2.

Number and rate of cognition‐related adverse events in trials analysed

Broad SMQ n (ratea) Narrow SMQ n (ratea)
PARADIGM‐HF
Enalapril (n = 4212) 97 (0.91, 0.73–1.12) 15 (0.16, 0.10–0.27)
Sacubitril/valsartan (n = 4187) 104 (0.92, 0.75–1.14) 12 (0.12, 0.07–0.21)
Hazard ratio (95% CI) 1.01 (0.75–1.37) 0.73 (0.33–1.59)
Val‐HeFT
Placebo (n = 2494) 139 (3.03, 2.57–3.56) 5 (0.11, 0.04–0.26)
Valsartan (n = 2506) 102 (2.20, 1.82–2.67) 6 (0.13, 0.06–0.28)
Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.73 (0.56–0.94) 1.12 (0.37–3.93)
CORONA
Placebo (n = 2497) 115 (1.62, 1.33–1.97) 19 (0.31, 0.20–0.48)
Rosuvastatin (n = 2514) 120 (1.74, 1.44–2.10) 28 (0.45, 0.31–0.65)
Hazard ratio (95% CI) 1.07 (0.82–1.41) 1.46 (0.82–2.62)
ATMOSPHERE
Enalapril (n = 2336) 52 (0.65, 0.48–0.85) 17 (0.21, 0.12–0.33)
Aliskiren (n = 2340) 81 (1.01,0.81–1.26) 20 (0.25, 0.15–0.38)
Combination (n = 2340) 85 (1.05, 0.84–1.30) 16 (0.20, 0.11–0.32)
Hazard ratio (95% CI)b 1.57 (1.11–2.22) 1.18 (0.62–2.26)
Hazard ratio (95% CI)c 1.63 (1.15–2.30) 0.93 (0.47–1.85)

CI, confidence interval; SMQ, Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Query.

a

Rates were calculated per 100 patient‐years (crude rate with 95% confidence interval). Rate for broad SMQ includes narrow SMQ terms.

b

Aliskiren vs. enalapril.

c

Combination vs. enalapril.