Table 2.
Thermal hypersensitivity of the ipsilateral hindpaw
| Day |
||||||
| –1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| Saline | 12.8 ± 0.6 | 6.8 ± 0.9a | 6.1 ± 0.6a | 8.8 ± 0.6a | 7.7 ± 0.5a | 9.2 ± 0.7a |
| Bup HCl | 14.3 ± 0.7 | 14.6 ± 2.0 | 12.4 ± 1.8 | 10.9 ± 1.1a | 10.2 ± 0.8a | 10.5 ± 0.6a |
| Bupi | 12.3 ± 0.7 | 10.0 ± 0.8 | 11.8 ± 1.9 | 9.6 ± 0.7 | 9.4 ± 0.7a | 10.1 ± 0.6 |
| Exp1 | 12.7 ± 0.4 | 10.1 ± 1.0 | 9.9 ± 1.0 | 10.0 ± 0.9 | 11.4 ± 0.7 | 10.5 ± 0.8 |
| Exp6 | 12.6 ± 0.9 | 9.6 ± 1.7 | 10.3 ± 0.7 | 10.5 ± 0.5 | 11.5 ± 1.0 | 11.1 ± 0.8 |
Data are shown as thermal latency (s; mean ± SEM).
a
Significantly (P < 0.05) different from the day –1 (baseline) value for the same treatment group