Abstract
The development of sustainable intestinal organoid cell culture has emerged as a new modality for the study of intestinal function and cellular processes. Organoid culture is providing a new test-bed for therapeutic research and development. Intestinal organoids, self-renewing three-dimensional structures comprised of intestinal stem cells and their differentiated epithelial progeny allow for more facile and robust exploration of cellular activity, cell organization and structure, genetic manipulation, and vastly more physiologic modeling of intestinal response to stimuli as compared to traditional two dimensional cell line cultures. Intestinal organoids are impacting a wide variety of research into gastrointestinal pathology. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current state-of-the-art and future impact of research using enteroids and colonoids (organoids grown from the small and large intestines respectively).
Keywords: Enteroid, Colonoid, lgr5, intestinal stem cell, Mini-gut, intestinal organoid, ex vivo, gut, precision medicine
Introduction
Accurate models of biological systems are vital to the advancement of all biosciences. The pursuit of a reliable and accurate ex vivo model of intestinal function has attracted much interest, owing to the limitations of existing two dimensional (2D) immortalized cell line-based systems. Heretofore, intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) would rapidly undergo anoikis (a form of apoptosis) following isolation, preventing establishment of primary, non-transformed IEC cultures. Building upon the earlier success of short term intestinal crypt cell culture on collagen coated vessels, the Clevers laboratory succeeded in the creation of the first self-renewing, non-transformed mini-gut organoid culture1. This significant advancement created a new way to study the function of the intestinal epithelium, yielding an accessible platform for basic and translational experimentation in a physiologically relevant context.
The pursuit of an ex vivo model of intestinal function has been a long one, beginning with initial success in growing adult crypt cells on collagen coated vessels, which could be propagated for short periods of time2. This evolved through efforts by Ootani and others to establish a culture system based on an air-liquid interface in which neonatal intestinal mucosa (epithelium and mesenchyme) formed long lasting organoid structures.3 The common ground between these systems is the requirement for mesenchymal fibroblasts, without which propagation is impossible. In 2009, Sato et al established a platform for organoid growth and propagation that broke free of mesenchymal dependence, instead employing a defined set of intestinal stem cell niche factors. This work simplified the process of growing and maintaining intestinal crypt cultures and expanded the variety of potential source material.
An organoid is defined as a miniature organ grown in vitro. It can be produced via adult multipotent stem cells or induced pluripotent cells (iPS) cultured in a stromal replacement such as Matrigel. Importantly, adult intestinal multipotent stem cells are limited in differentiation to intestinal epithelium whereas iPS cells, derived from embryonic stem (ES) cells or reprogrammed from adult tissue, can be driven to differentiate into a broader array of cells.4 When referring to intestinal organoids, the source of the harvested tissue further defines the structure and characteristics of the resulting organoid. Tissue harvested from the small intestine will recapitulate small intestinal function and structure, and is termed an “enteroid,” based on NIH-sponsored consensus guidelines5. Similarly, cells harvested from the colon will recapitulate the colon, creating a “colonoid.” Intestinal organoids can be produced from either isolated intestinal stem cells or stem cell-containing intestinal crypts. Both methods result in growth of a three dimensional structure of epithelial cells. The structure of these cells will resemble their in vivo organization when supplied with appropriate exogenous growth factors and basement membrane scaffolding (e.g. Matrigel). All intestinal cell types are represented in this structure, including lgr5+ crypt-based columnar stem cells (CBC ISC, hereafter simply ISC), quiescent stem cells (QSCs), transit-amplifying (TA) cells, absorptive enterocytes, goblet cells, enteroendocrine cells, and Paneth cells. ISCs are defined as cells that regenerate crypt-villus units for a lifetime, and are possessed of long-term self-renewal and multipotent differentiation. They can differentiate into all intestinal cell types. ISCs, marked by the Wnt-amplifyng gene lgr5, retain the capacity to functionally expand and recreate the crypt-villus structure. QSCs represent the reserve stable of ISCs activated following lgr5 CBC loss6. The TA cells rapidly amplify to create tissue mass and precursors for differentiation. Each of the other listed type is a fully differentiated cell, with absorptive enterocytes serving the engine of nutritional absorption, goblet cells creating a protective mucus layer, EECs secreting gastrointestinal hormones, and Paneth cells producing protective antimicrobial peptides7. The ability to recreate this structure allows researchers to create a stable, modifiable ex vivo model of intestinal tissue function. The self-renewing property of intestinal organoids enables indefinite propagation and expansion using standard cell culture techniques, allowing an increase in research throughput as compared to prior techniques of intestinal stem cell culture that necessitated continually sourced starting material. Intestinal stem cells can be harvested from either animal or human subjects, including both surgical and endoscopic biopsy specimens. iPS cells (can also form intestinal organoids8. In this review we will focus on enteroids and colonoids derived from ISCs (both human and murine).
Enteroids and colonoids have wide ranging applications and potential uses. The ability to characterize intestinal epithelial development is substantial, with the establishment of the crypt/villus axis enabling cell tracking and fate analysis1. Many of the uses of organoids for fate analysis and developmental biology purposes are well covered in recent reviews, including recent publications by Zachos et al9 and Carulli et al10. In addition, newer techniques where organoids are linearlized into epithelial sheets are allowing for development of new high throughput screens with more physiologically accurate epithelial structure, which may supplant immortalized cells in usage for high-throughput analysis and permeability analysis. For the purposes of this review, we will focus on the current state of the field with regard to clinical and translational applications of enteroid and colonoid technology.
Organoid Growth and Maintenance
Enteroids were initially created from small intestinal crypts containing lgr5+ ISCs7 harvested from mice1. Harvested crypts were induced to self-renew and differentiate by the addition of Epithelial Growth Factor (EGF), R-Spondin, and Noggin to standard growth media1. When cultured in basement membrane extract with these growth factors, ISCs will self-renew, differentiate, and self-organize into enteroids, with the lumen on the inside of a 3-dimensional structure (Fig 1). These assemblages resemble the macroscopic structure of the intestines with polarized epithelial cells forming a simple columnar epithelium with distinct crypt and villus domains. As it stands, the interior-oriented apical organizational structure presents a challenge to existing experimental techniques, as we will discuss below.
Figure 1.
A) Murine small intestinal organoid. Note the distinct crypt and villus domains B) Illustration of typical intestinal organoid structure and distribution of intestinal epithelial cell types
The components of the growth media have been well studied and optimized for sustained ex vivo growth. The basement membrane extract is produced by Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm (EHS) tumor cell line and mimics the native supportive stroma11. This allows for the ISCs to attach to a superstructure, supporting epithelial cell survival through integrin signaling, and suppressing anoikis. R-spondin, a secreted protein mainly expressed by subepithelial fibroblasts, binds to the lgr5 receptor, suppressing degradation of Wnt receptors and potentiating Wnt activation, a key ingredient for the maintenance of the ISCs12,13. Noggin is a secreted glycoprotein and BMP antagonist, and has proved essential to maintenance of enteroid cultures. Without Noggin, enteroids lose lgr5 expression and cease proliferation after 2 weeks1. BMP is a mesenchymal product thought to be responsible for driving intestinal differentiation, but may also regulate ISCs14. EGF is required for epithelial cell survival and long term culture15,16.
Human enteroids can be created using ISCs harvested from intestinal tissue in much the same manner as murine enteroids. Human enteroids require the addition of the canonical WNT ligand Wnt-3A, a p38 inhibitor (small molecule SB202190) and TGF-β inhibitor (typically ALK 4/5/7 inhibitors like A83-01 or SB431542)17. Human cells require addition of exogenous Wnt to grow, likely secondary to insufficient endogenous Wnt production when compared to murine organoids14. Addition of p38 inhibitors is necessary to suppress secretory lineage differentiation, which if allowed to proceed unchecked would deplete the supply of ISCs necessary to maintain the culture. It is not clear at this time why this is a requirement for human and not murine culture. TGF-β inhibition is necessary for human cell culture likely due to increased sensitivity to the BMP/ TGF-β pathway, in which TGF-β will inhibit WNT-driven cell proliferation14. Colonoids are at this point more challenging to maintain in culture. While colonoids have been successfully cultured using methodology similar to enteroids14, they have been found to have a different response to Wnt-3A signaling than enteroids, and may be more successfully cultured using Wnt-3A, prostaglandin E2, and nicotinamide in addition to standard mouse small intestinal culture media18.
Enteroids and the Study of Gastrointestinal Infectious Diseases
Enteroid and colonoid technology creates a novel way of modeling enteric infectious processes, enabling both the interrogation of host-pathogen interactions and the search for therapeutic targets. This is an issue of tremendous importance, as diarrheal disease remains one of the world’s largest health issues. Pioneering research demonstrates the superiority of the intestinal organoid system over immortalized cell culture for study of the molecular pathogenesis of these diseases.
Rotavirus remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality despite the increasing prevalence of oral vaccines, with a pediatric mortality of over 450,000 children under 5 annually19. Enteroid culture allows a much closer and more accurate modeling of the infectious process than previously possible by supporting the full viral life cycle20. Furthermore, intestinal organoids have been shown to be more permissive for infection than immortalized lines20, again more closely modeling the in vivo infectious process. Although at this time enteroid culture has primarily complemented previous work done using 2D immortalized lines, the fidelity of the pathologic model increases confidence in recent therapeutic intervention studies demonstrating the effectiveness of interferon-α and ribavirin inhibition of viral reproduction20.
Organoids have also been used to study host-bacterial pathologies, including many of the most common and problematic infectious agents. Clostridium difficile remains the main antibiotic-associated cause of diarrhea in the United States, with an estimated healthcare cost of over 1 billion dollars annually21. The pathology of C. difficile has been studied extensively in immortalized cell lines, but the development of organoids has allowed for confirmation of previous findings and further advances into the cellular mechanisms of cytotoxicity. Investigators have used human colonoids to examine the pathologic role of C. difficile toxins on intestinal epithelium22,23. Previously it was known that in immortalized cell lines, C. difficile toxin A and B function by binding uncharacterized host receptors that trigger the inhibition of Rho GTPases, leading to disorganization of the cytoskeleton, loss of tight junctions, and disruption of signaling and the cell cycle24. In addition, Toxin B is known to diminish expression of the NHE3 sodium/hydrogen exchanger25, resulting in increased diarrhea. Researchers confirmed and extended these findings using colonoids exposed to C. difficile via microinjection of cultured bacteria, fecal material from C. difficile infected patients, or purified C. difficile toxins TcdA and TcdB22. These works confirmed TcdA-mediated epithelial tight junction damage and identified NHE3 upregulation as a target for therapeutic agents aimed at interrupting the process by which C. difficile creates a hospitable environment for itself. It also provides evidentiary support for the improvement generated by lactobacilli, which upregulates NHE3 expression22. Greater understanding of the pathogenesis and mechanisms by which C. difficile causes illness provides new possible targets for therapeutic intervention and primary prevention.
Other studies have demonstrated the utility of live bacterial co-culture with intestinal organoids. Zhang and colleagues studied the mechanism and time course of salmonella infection of enteroids26. Following only a brief incubation period, they found significant bacterial adherence and invasion of the intestinal epithelial cells. RNA expression and immunofluorescence analysis identified a decrease in the important tight junction proteins ZO-1, Occludin, and Claudins, thereby demonstrating a direct impact on epithelial tight junctions. Salmonella infection further elicited the onset of the inflammatory cascade, with NF-KB activation and an expansion in expression of inflammatory cytokines from the enteroid culture. The ability of enteroids to recapitulate the infectious process in ex vivo culture presents a valuable opportunity to develop therapeutic agents that go beyond simple bactericidal mechanisms and directly block the translocation and infection of the host. Enteroids and colonoids are a significant improvement in reductive modeling over traditional epithelial cultures, by providing the native crypt structure, epithelial cell subtypes, and intestinal epithelial tight junctions that resemble those found in vivo.
The exploration of the intestinal organoid culture as a model for infectious pathology presents a tremendous opportunity for further discovery and intervention in infectious enteric diseases. Currently, 9 out of 10 drugs fail in clinical trials, many due to differences between animal models and human biology27. The ability to recreate human biology in vitro vastly increases the applicability of pharmacologic research, both broadening the approachable targets and validating initial efficacy in a more robust model. While significant work has been done using immortalized cell lines to delineate the basics of infectious pathophysiology for many agents, the enhanced fidelity of enteroids and colonoids, as well as the differences noted in protein expression (possibly due to interactions between epithelial cell types) illustrate the value of these models. The main limitation of this model is that only intestinal epithelial cells are represented, therefore potentially important contributions from immune or mesenchymal cells may be missed.
Enteroids and Diarrheal Disease
Diarrheal disease remains one of the greatest causes of morbidity and mortality in the world, accounting for approximately 4% of all deaths worldwide, and 1.2 million pediatric deaths annually28. Research into the mechanisms of pathogenic insult and the onset of secretory diarrhea has benefited from the emergence of enteroids. In all diarrheal illness there is a reduction in sodium absorption primarily due to inhibition of the brush border NHE Na+/H+ exchanger potentiated by interference with the Cl−/HC03− exchanger DRA29. In enterotoxigenic diarrhea, activation of CFTR contributes significantly to anion secretion30. Using genetic and pharmacologic approaches, researchers have confirmed that enteroids express these key transporters at physiological levels and maintain their ion exchange function31. Given these findings, enteroids are well-suited for study of intestinal anion/fluid homeostasis. Specifically, enteroids and colonoids can be used to explore the precise mechanisms involved in pathologic alterations contributing to diarrhea.
Initial work in the area has identified a novel therapeutic target for severe secretory diarrheas such as Vibrio cholera infection. Using human enteroids, Foulke-Abel et al were able to identify that NBCe1, a basolaterally located cAMP mediated bicarbonate transporter, and CFTR were integral to secretory diarrhea pathways whereas other bicarbonate transporters including NKCC1, a basolateral sodium-potassium-chloride transporter, are not. Using a high throughput forskolin induced swelling assay in conjunction with inhibitors of NKCC1, Foulke-Abel and colleagues demonstrated pharmacologic blockade of NKCC1 only partially impacts swelling. This suggests residual stimulated fluid secretion is supported by other loaders. Indeed, pre-treatment with an NBCe1 inhibitor generated intracellular acidification in enteroids following forskolin stimulation. This observation suggested an inability of cells to replace bicarbonate secreted by CFTR and therefore treatments interfering with NBCe1 function could diminish movement of bicarbonate in intestinal cells, preventing both fluid loss and resultant acidemia31.
Enteroids and the Study of Cystic Fibrosis
One of the initial benefactors of the advent of intestinal organoids has been research in CF intestinal disease. From better delineating the pathogenesis of CF intestinal complications (constipation, cellular hyperproliferation, dysbiosis, inflammation, cancer risk), to investigating possible treatment options, the research platform provided by both ex vivo culture of mouse CFTR knockout enteroids and enteroids derived from CF patients has wide implications in the field.
CFTR is a major pathway of Cl− and HCO3− ion efflux from intestinal epithelial cells. Knockout of CFTR in mice creates a physiologically relevant alkaline shift32. Enteroid technology has allowed better understanding of the impact of a CFTR mutation on pH balance33, specifically showing CFTR non-function creates an alkaline shift in the intestinal epithelial cells through local cell-mediated processes. The impact of this effect is substantial, as an alkaline pH is known to encourage cellular hyperproliferation by favoring cell cycle progression34,35 which in turn sets the stage for the development of neoplasia36. Given that CF patients have a 6 fold increased risk for intestinal cancer and that research shows the potential to decrease this epithelial alkalosis by reducing Cl− concentration in the epithelium33, this presents an interesting opportunity to attempt to modify the risk of CF-related intestinal neoplasia.
Perhaps even more revelatory for CF research is the opportunity to use enteroids as models for drug development and genetic therapy. Intestinal colonoids have already been adapted for high-throughput screening of CF therapeutic agents using a forskolin model. Exposure to forskolin37 increases intracellular cAMP, activating CFTR. In non-CF cells, this leads to increased fluid secretion into the lumen. A successful high-throughput screen using a microfluidics capture system based on optical measurement of colonoid swelling in response to forskolin exposure38 has been designed. In this assay, colonoid size is monitored by an automated imaging system after exposure to an osmotic challenge in the form of forskolin and a potentially protective therapeutic agent. An agent that successfully augments mutant CFTR function displays similar enlargement to wild type colonoids. This relatively simple assay may allow for improvements in personalized therapy (given the capacity to grow colonoids from a specific patient), as well as a sizeable impact on drug development.
With the recent emergence of CRISPR, the ability to culture enteroids and colonoids offers a model of human cellular response to genomic alterations, especially given the ability to stabily passage multiple generations and monitor the persistence and effects of the engineered changes over time. Schwank et al have shown that the CRISPR/Cas9 system can correct F508 mutations in organoids harvested from CF patients, with full rescue of the CFTR phenotype39. While targeted stem cell therapy may not be applicable for CF patients given the multi-organ nature of the disease, the research potential and implications for the field more broadly is substantial.
Enteroids, Colonoids, and Oncology
Antitumor pharmacologic research has long benefited from traditional cell culture of immortalized cancer cell lines, but these cultures have significant limitations. Namely, lack of personalization to an individual’s tumor, introduction of genomic instability by immortalization, and inability of the cell lines to match the function and structure of the original heterogeneous tumor. Intestinal organoid technology offers the capability of growing cultured tumors specific to an individual, allowing for rapid improvement in personalized medicine through the use of tumor-tailored therapeutics.
Proof-of-principle for this concept was recently published by the Clevers laboratory. Tumor organoids (tumoroids) were successfully cultured from colorectal cancer alongside colonoids from normal tissue40. Genetic fidelity between the original tumors and the tumoroids proved to be consistent. Furthermore, Clevers was able to adapt the tumoroids to a roboticized high-throughput drug screen to determine anti-neoplastic drug sensitivities. New work is underway to expand this methodology into xenograft assays, in which tumoroids are implanted into mice allowing for more broad experimentation with anti-neoplastics in the context of an animal host41. In addition, other work into using colonoids as a model of response to radiotherapy has been validated42, potentially furthering the role of truly individualized oncologic treatment for intestinal cancers.
Short Gut, Intestinal Regrowth, and Intestinal Organoids
Intestinal organoids represent a possible therapeutic avenue for the treatment of short gut, with multiple lines of research into using organoids to either repair damaged intestines in situ or to potentially tissue engineer intestines for what essentially amounts to auto-transplantation.
In 2012, Yui et al demonstrated intestinal organoids can seed mouse colonic mucosa damaged via the dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) colitis model and repair the epithelial wound43. Murine colonoids were instilled into the damaged colons via enema. One week following instillation, colonic lesions showed significant recovery with organoid engraftment, and by 4 weeks the treated colons demonstrated repaired and healthy colonic structures with appropriate epithelial barrier function. Later studies confirmed these findings, and interestingly, found that the transplanted lgr5+ stem cells maintain the identity of the bowel region they were derived from, allowing the creation of heterotopic rests with different functional capabilities44 and suggesting tissue-specific programing occurs during intestinal stem cell production. The potential of this therapy to repair intestinal inflammatory damage is broad-reaching, most notably in therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. While recognizing the limitations of adapting processes successful in murine models to human therapy, with further characterization of signaling the ability to implant functioning heterotopic rests suggests potential therapeutic options for patients with partial intestinal resection, specifically to provide functions of lost intestine which cannot be restored by adaptation, such as ileal-dependent absorption of bile salts and vitamin B12.
Work into in vitro growing of functional intestinal grafts continues, with organoids serving as the basis for several successful studies into tissue engineered intestines. Multiple groups45,46,47 have shown the ability to use organoids to grow both colon and small intestinal structures by seeding a polyglycolic/poly-L-lactic acid (PGA/PLLA) scaffold with ISCs, and growing them in vivo via implantation into immune-deficient mice. This results in a tubular structure which functionally reproduces the architectural, absorptive, and barrier membrane aspects of the intestinal lumen. While artificially grown intestinal segments lack glia and neurons necessary for motility, these initial efforts yielding epithelial structures grown on an artificial superstructure are a promising step towards the development of true tissue-engineered intestines. The capacity for auto-transplantation of the small and large intestine has real and near-term implications for pure epithelial disorders such as microvillus inclusion disease or tufting enteropathy.
Conclusion and Limitations
Enteroids have already enabled new avenues of research into intestinal function and pathology, but there is still significant room to improve in modeling the true physiology of intestinal function. The enteroid is solely an epithelial structure, and even in terms of modeling intestinal epithelial responses it is limited by our current inability to fully form signaling gradients such as BMP found in human tissue. The structural limitations of enteroids create a challenge in exposing the apical aspect to experimentation, as well as in techniques for imaging or functional endpoints. In addition, they fail to capture the input and interactions of other cell and tissue types key to understanding a variety of intestinal pathology such as inflammatory or motility diseases. However, new developments in the field promise to help alleviate some of these shortcomings.
One of the main limitations of the current model of enteroid culture is mechanical, specifically that the three dimensional structure of enteroids can limit certain types of experimentation, as the apical aspect is inside the enteroid. Techniques such as microinjection have circumvented this issue for initial studies, but in order to access other applications, new techniques are required, specifically in monolayer culture of enteroids and colonoids. In a recent publication, Scott et al were able to successfully demonstrate a protocol for growing intestinal stem cells in proliferative and confluent monolayers, based on matrix of type 1 collagen and laminin isotypes48. Other investigators have worked on similar methods of 2D enteroid culture, with varying degrees of success. This alleviates some of the structural restrictions in using 3D enteroid culture, providing easier methodology for exposure of the apical surface, imaging of the cells, and lending itself more to high throughput screens. There is even the potential to supplant CaCo-2 as the barrier membrane of choice for pharmaceutical investigations, allowing for a more physiologic understanding of oral drug delivery.
Progress is being made in improving the capability of organoid culture to fully mimic in vivo responses by adding layers of complexity to the reductionist model. Recent successes in co-culture of murine enteroids and murine intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) suggest the potential for even more robust modeling of infectious pathophysiology, inflammatory disease, and intestinal healing49. The ability to further expand the capacity of this ground breaking ex vivo model may provide the tools to explore not only the activities and interactions of intestinal cells, but the broader superstructure surrounding it.
In the past five years, the development of in vitro modeling of organ function has changed the face of biological research. Far from the approximations of intestinal epithelial cell interactions possible with immortalized cell lines, this new technology has already allowed for a fuller understanding of host-pathogen interaction in the intestines, increased understanding of congenital diseases from cystic fibrosis to microvillus inclusion disease50, and a introduced a whole new field of potential therapeutic intervention for short gut or surgically altered intestines. It has provided a major new platform for personalized medicine, with individualized tumor organoid culture only the first wave of applications for the testing of personalized therapy under development, especially in light of the NIH Precision Medicine Initiative. As additional work proceeds in co-culture with other cell types, and our ability to model in vivo systems in an in vitro capacity improves, the potential of this technology is enormous.
What is Known
Intestinal Stem Cells (ISCs) are self-renewing pluripotent stem cells inhabiting the intestinal crypt
ISCs can be experimentally induced to create a functional recapitulation of the large and small intestinal epithelium
What is New
Intestinal organoids are currently being used to study a variety of host-pathogen interactions
Intestinal organoids serve as a useful platform for drug screening and personalized medicine
Disease specific ex vivo models can be created from patient-derived material.
Intestinal organoids may someday support the creation of tissue-engineered small intestines
Acknowledgments
Sources of funding:
K12HD07222
T32DK007762
F32CA163092
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Author Contributions
T. Wallach performed the literature review, synopsis, and authored the manuscript
J. Bayrer assisted with literature search, writing, and editing of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Sato T, Vries RG, Snippert HJ, et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature. 2009;459(7244):262–265. doi: 10.1038/nature07935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Evans GS, Flint N, Somers AS, Eyden B, Potten CS. The development of a method for the preparation of rat intestinal epithelial cell primary cultures. J Cell Sci. 1992;101((Pt 1)(Pt 1)):219–231. doi: 10.1242/jcs.101.1.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ootani A, Li X, Sangiorgi E, et al. Sustained in vitro intestinal epithelial culture within a wnt-dependent stem cell niche. Nat Med. 2009;15(6):701–706. doi: 10.1038/nm.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2007;448(7151):313–317. doi: 10.1038/nature05934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stelzner M, Helmrath M, Dunn JC, et al. A nomenclature for intestinal in vitro cultures. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;302(12):G1359–G1363. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00493.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tian H, Biehs B, Warming S, et al. A reserve stem cell population in small intestine renders Lgr5-positive cells dispensable. Nature. 2011;478(7368):255–259. doi: 10.1038/nature10408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Barker N, van Es JH, Kuipers J, et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature. 2007;449(7165):1003–1007. doi: 10.1038/nature06196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Watson CL, Mahe MM, Munera, Jorge, et al. An in vivo model of human small intestine using pluripotent stem cells. doi: 10.1038/nm.3737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zachos NC, Kovbasnjuk O, Foulke-Abel J, et al. Human enteroids/colonoids and intestinal organoids functionally recapitulate normal intestinal physiology and pathophysiology. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(8):3759–3766. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R114.635995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Carulli AJ, Samuelson LC, Schnell S. Unraveling intestinal stem cell behavior with models of crypt dynamics. Integr Biol (Camb) 2014;6(3):243–257. doi: 10.1039/c3ib40163d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kleinman HK, McGarvey ML, Hassell JR, et al. Basement membrane complexes with biological activity. Biochemistry. 1986;25(2):312–318. doi: 10.1021/bi00350a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hao HX, Xie Y, Zhang Y, et al. ZNRF3 promotes wnt receptor turnover in an R-spondin-sensitive manner. Nature. 2012;485(7397):195–200. doi: 10.1038/nature11019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Koo BK, Spit M, Jordens I, et al. Tumour suppressor RNF43 is a stem-cell E3 ligase that induces endocytosis of wnt receptors. Nature. 2012;488(7413):665–669. doi: 10.1038/nature11308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sato T, Stange DE, Ferrante M, et al. Long-term expansion of epithelial organoids from human colon, adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and barrett's epithelium. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(5):1762–1772. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.de Jong PR, Takahashi N, Harris AR, et al. Ion channel TRPV1-dependent activation of PTP1B suppresses EGFR-associated intestinal tumorigenesis. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(9):3793–3806. doi: 10.1172/JCI72340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wong VW, Stange DE, Page ME, et al. Lrig1 controls intestinal stem-cell homeostasis by negative regulation of ErbB signalling. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14(4):401–408. doi: 10.1038/ncb2464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sato T, Clevers H. Growing self-organizing mini-guts from a single intestinal stem cell: Mechanism and applications. Science. 2013;340(6137):1190–1194. doi: 10.1126/science.1234852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jung P, Sato T, Merlos-Suarez A, et al. Isolation and in vitro expansion of human colonic stem cells. Nat Med. 2011;17(10):1225–1227. doi: 10.1038/nm.2470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rotavirus vaccines WHO position paper: January 2013 - recommendations. Vaccine. 2013;31(52):6170–6171. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yin Y, Bijvelds M, Dang W, et al. Modeling rotavirus infection and antiviral therapy using primary intestinal organoids. Antiviral Res. 2015;123:120–131. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.O'Brien JA, Lahue BJ, Caro JJ, Davidson DM. The emerging infectious challenge of clostridium difficile-associated disease in massachusetts hospitals: Clinical and economic consequences. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28(11):1219–1227. doi: 10.1086/522676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Engevik MA, Engevik KA, Yacyshyn MB, et al. Human clostridium difficile infection: Inhibition of NHE3 and microbiota profile. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015;308(6):G497–G509. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00090.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Leslie JL, Huang S, Opp JS, et al. Persistence and toxin production by clostridium difficile within human intestinal organoids result in disruption of epithelial paracellular barrier function. Infection and Immunity. 2015;83(1):138–145. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02561-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lyras D, O'Connor JR, Howarth PM, et al. Toxin B is essential for virulence of clostridium difficile. Nature. 2009;458(7242):1176–1179. doi: 10.1038/nature07822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hayashi H, Szaszi K, Coady-Osberg N, et al. Inhibition and redistribution of NHE3, the apical na+/H+ exchanger, by clostridium difficile toxin B. J Gen Physiol. 2004;123(5):491–504. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200308979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang YG, Wu S, Xia Y, Sun J. Salmonella-infected crypt-derived intestinal organoid culture system for host-bacterial interactions. Physiol Rep. 2014;2(9) doi: 10.14814/phy2.12147. 10.14814/phy2.12147. Print 2014 Sep 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Woodcock J, Woosley R. The FDA critical path initiative and its influence on new drug development. Annu Rev Med. 2008;59:1–12. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.59.090506.155819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kosek M, Bern C, Guerrant RL. The global burden of diarrhoeal disease, as estimated from studies published between 1992 and 2000. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(3):197–204. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Abreu MT, Arnold ET, Chow JY, Barrett KE. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent pathways oppose fas-induced apoptosis and limit chloride secretion in human intestinal epithelial cells. implications for inflammatory diarrheal states. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(50):47563–47574. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106226200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Petri WA, Jr, Miller M, Binder HJ, Levine MM, Dillingham R, Guerrant RL. Enteric infections, diarrhea, and their impact on function and development. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(4):1277–1290. doi: 10.1172/JCI34005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Foulke-Abel J, In J, Yin J, et al. Human enteroids as a model of upper small intestinal ion transport physiology and pathophysiology. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(3):638–649. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gottlieb RA, Dosanjh A. Mutant cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator inhibits acidification and apoptosis in C127 cells: Possible relevance to cystic fibrosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1996;93(8):3587–3591. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Walker NM, Liu J, Stein SR, Stefanski CD, Strubberg AM, Clarke LL. Cellular chloride and bicarbonate retention alters intracellular pH regulation in cftr KO crypt epithelium. American Journal of Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2016;310(2):G70–G80. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00236.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schreiber R. Ca2+ signaling, intracellular pH and cell volume in cell proliferation. J Membr Biol. 2005;205(3):129–137. doi: 10.1007/s00232-005-0778-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Putney LK, Barber DL. Na-H exchange-dependent increase in intracellular pH times G2/M entry and transition. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(45):44645–44649. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308099200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Evan GI, Vousden KH. Proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in cancer. Nature. 2001;411(6835):342–348. doi: 10.1038/35077213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cunningham SA, Worrell RT, Benos DJ, Frizzell RA. cAMP-stimulated ion currents in xenopus oocytes expressing CFTR cRNA. Am J Physiol. 1992;262(3 Pt 1):C783–C788. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1992.262.3.C783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dekkers JF, Wiegerinck CL, de Jonge HR, et al. A functional CFTR assay using primary cystic fibrosis intestinal organoids. Nat Med. 2013;19(7):939–945. doi: 10.1038/nm.3201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schwank G, Koo BK, Sasselli V, et al. Functional repair of CFTR by CRISPR/Cas9 in intestinal stem cell organoids of cystic fibrosis patients. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;13(6):653–658. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.van de Wetering M, Francies HE, Francis JM, et al. Prospective derivation of a living organoid biobank of colorectal cancer patients. Cell. 2015;161(4):933–945. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Aparicio S, Hidalgo M, Kung AL. Examining the utility of patient-derived xenograft mouse models. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(5):311–316. doi: 10.1038/nrc3944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yamauchi M, Otsuka K, Kondo H, et al. A novel in vitro survival assay of small intestinal stem cells after exposure to ionizing radiation. J Radiat Res. 2014;55(2):381–390. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrt123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yui S, Nakamura T, Sato T, et al. Functional engraftment of colon epithelium expanded in vitro from a single adult Lgr5(+) stem cell. Nat Med. 2012;18(4):618–623. doi: 10.1038/nm.2695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fukuda M, Mizutani T, Mochizuki W, et al. Small intestinal stem cell identity is maintained with functional paneth cells in heterotopically grafted epithelium onto the colon. Genes Dev. 2014;28(16):1752–1757. doi: 10.1101/gad.245233.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Levin DE, Barthel ER, Speer AL, et al. Human tissue-engineered small intestine forms from postnatal progenitor cells. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(1):129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Barthel ER, Speer AL, Levin DE, et al. Tissue engineering of the intestine in a murine model. J Vis Exp. 2012;(70):e4279. doi: 10.3791/4279. doi(70):e4279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Finkbeiner SR, Freeman JJ, Wieck MM, et al. Generation of tissue-engineered small intestine using embryonic stem cell-derived human intestinal organoids. Biology Open. 2015;4(11):1462–1472. doi: 10.1242/bio.013235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Scott A, Rouch JD, Jabaji Z, et al. Long-term renewable human intestinal epithelial stem cells as monolayers: A potential for clinical use. J Pediatr Surg. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nozaki K, Mochizuki W, Matsumoto Y, et al. Co-culture with intestinal epithelial organoids allows efficient expansion and motility analysis of intraepithelial lymphocytes. J Gastroenterol. 2016 doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1170-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Canani RB, Castaldo G, Bacchetta R, Martin MG, Goulet O. Congenital diarrhoeal disorders: Advances in this evolving web of inherited enteropathies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12(5):293–302. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

