Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec;13(4):459–468. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0077

2.

Univariate analyses of factors associated with OS and TTR

Variable OS TTR
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P Hazard ratio (95% CI) P
95% CI, 95% confidence interval; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; NS, not significant (Cox proportional hazards regression model); BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Staging System.
Age, years (> 52 vs. ≤ 52) 0.531 (0.723-1.875) 0.531 1.122 (0.683-1.842) 0.650
HBsAg (positive vs. negative) 2.554 (0.929-7.021) 0.069 3.187 (0.997-10.182) 0.051
AFP (ng/mL; > 20 vs. ≤ 20) 1.717 (1.033-2.856) 0.037 1.539 (0.916-2.585) 0.104
Liver cirrhosis (yes vs. no) 1.211 (0.619-2.371) 0.576 1.693 (0.770-3.722) 0.190
ALT (U/L; > 75 vs. ≤ 75) 1.964 (1.072-3.597) 0.029 1.668 (0.848-3.282) 0.138
Tumor size (cm; > 5 vs. ≤ 5) 2.198 (1.328-3.639) 0.002 1.927 ( 1.120-3.318) 0.018
Tumor number (multiple vs. single) 2.915 (1.057-8.042) 0.039 1.273 (0.310-5.221) 0.738
Vascular invasion (yes vs. no) 2.435 (1.509-3.931) <0.001 1.915 (1.153-3.182) 0.012
BCLC stage (B/C vs. A) 2.046 (1.096-3.821) 0.025 1.767 (0.958-3.261) 0.068
Tumor differentiation (III-IV vs. I-II) 1.440 (0.871-2.381) 0.156 1.533 (0.912-2.577) 0.107
Tumor encapsulation (none vs. complete) 1.419 (0.880-2.287) 0.151 1.278 (0.779-2.096) 0.331
Bcl-2 (high vs. low) 0.403 (0.245-0.665) <0.001 0.368 (0.219-0.618) <0.001