Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 21;12:5. doi: 10.1186/s13011-017-0089-2

Table 3.

Comparison of effects in situations of conflicting norms

Non-smokers with smoking experience Light smokers Heavy smokers
B Std. Error p Odds B Std. Error p Odds B Std. Error p Odds
Within norms conflict between referents
Peers smoke, parents do not smoke vs Parents and peers do not smoke 2.179 .187 .000 8.835 2.997 .513 .000 20.025 3.131 .590 .000 22.893
Peers do not smoke, parents smoke Parents and peers do not smoke .743 .240 .002 2.103 .264 .765 .731 1.302 -.555 1.156 .631 .574
Peers and parents smoke Parents and peers do not smoke 2.745 .187 .000 15.570 3.562 .512 .000 35.228 4.307 .585 .000 74.208
Peers approve, parents do not approve Parents and peers do not approve .465 .236 .049 1.592 .390 .409 .340 1.478 1.534 .255 .000 4.638
Between norms conflict within one referent
Peers approve and smoke Peers do not approve and do not smoke 2.504 .269 .000 12.236 3.509 .553 .000 33.404 5.387 .557 .000 218.530
Peers do not approve and smoke 2.105 .129 .000 8.210 3.128 .387 .000 22.837 3.870 .506 .000 47.945
Peers approve and do not smoke 1.184 .782 .059 4.392 - - - - - - - -

Show results of a first multinomial logistic regression with a model interaction that compare the conflictual situations of the two referent groups within one type of norm, and of a second multinomial logistic regression that compare the influence of two types of norms within one type of referent